Rich restrictions imply non-stable minimality for interval exchange transformations

About 11 years old · traced to

Let T\testT_{\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}} be an interval exchange transformation with permutation \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}, and let \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} be a restriction space. Write \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} for the paper's bilinear form associated with the permutation. The space \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} is rich with respect to \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} when it satisfies the paper's rich-space condition, and T\testT_{\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}} is \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}-stably minimal when minimality persists under perturbations satisfying \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}.

Rich-restriction instability conjecture. If \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} is rich with respect to \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}} and T\testT_{\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}} satisfies all restrictions from \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}, then T\testT_{\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}} is not \test\boldsymbol{\boldsymbol{\test}}-stably minimal.

Together with stability of non-minimality, this would imply that minimal transformations form a nowhere-dense subset of the corresponding restricted parameter space. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

References

Primary source

Ivan Dynnikov and Alexandra Skripchenko, “Minimality of interval exchange transformations with restrictions”, arXiv:1510.03707 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.