Cosocle decomposition conjecture for simple modules over cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras

About 11 years old · traced to

Let AA be a simple R(ν)R(\nu)-module in Rep⁡Λi\operatorname{Rep}^{\Lambda_i} with ∣ν∣≥1|\nu|\geq 1. Let r(A)r(A) and R(A)\mathcal{R}(A) be as in the preceding theorem for trivial modules, and let c(A)c(A) and C(A)\mathcal{C}(A) be defined by the corresponding sign-module theorem. Write Ti;r(A)T_{i;r(A)} and Si;c(A)S_{i;c(A)} for the associated trivial and sign modules. Cosocle decomposition conjecture. With these hypotheses and definitions,

A=cosoc⁡ pr⁡ΛiInd⁡Ti;r(A)⊠R(A),A=\operatorname{cosoc}\,\operatorname{pr}_{\Lambda_i}\operatorname{Ind}T_{i;r(A)}\boxtimes\mathcal{R}(A),

and

A=cosoc⁡ pr⁡ΛiInd⁡Si;c(A)⊠C(A).A=\operatorname{cosoc}\,\operatorname{pr}_{\Lambda_i}\operatorname{Ind}S_{i;c(A)}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}(A).

The surrounding results establish surjections from the displayed induced modules onto AA; the assertion strengthens these to identifications of AA with their cosocles. The supplied text gives no evidence that this claim has been proved or refuted elsewhere.

References

Primary source

Monica Vazirani, “Categorifying the tensor product of a level 1 highest weight and perfect crystal in type A”, arXiv:1508.03802 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.