Cosocle decomposition conjecture for simple modules over cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras

Let AA be a simple R(ν)R(\nu)-module in RepΛi\operatorname{Rep}^{\Lambda_i} with ν1|\nu|\geq 1. Let r(A)r(A) and R(A)\mathcal{R}(A) be as in the preceding theorem for trivial modules, and let c(A)c(A) and C(A)\mathcal{C}(A) be defined by the corresponding sign-module theorem. Write Ti;r(A)T_{i;r(A)} and Si;c(A)S_{i;c(A)} for the associated trivial and sign modules. Cosocle decomposition conjecture. With these hypotheses and definitions,

A=cosocprΛiIndTi;r(A)R(A),A=\operatorname{cosoc}\,\operatorname{pr}_{\Lambda_i}\operatorname{Ind}T_{i;r(A)}\boxtimes\mathcal{R}(A),

and

A=cosocprΛiIndSi;c(A)C(A).A=\operatorname{cosoc}\,\operatorname{pr}_{\Lambda_i}\operatorname{Ind}S_{i;c(A)}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}(A).

The surrounding results establish surjections from the displayed induced modules onto AA; the assertion strengthens these to identifications of AA with their cosocles. The supplied text gives no evidence that this claim has been proved or refuted elsewhere.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Monica Vazirani, “Categorifying the tensor product of a level 1 highest weight and perfect crystal in type A”, arXiv:1508.03802 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.