The non-frame conjecture for singular counterexamples to the B-spline Gabor frame property

Let G(B2,a,b)\mathcal{G}(B_2,a,b) denote the Gabor system generated by the quadratic B-spline B2B_2 with parameters a,b>0a,b>0. Let k,mNk,m\in\mathbb{N} satisfy k>mk>m and a0b0<1a_0b_0<1, where

a0=12m+1,b0=2k+12.a_0=\frac{1}{2m+1},\qquad b_0=\frac{2k+1}{2}.

Non-frame conjecture. The Gabor system G(B2,a0,b0)\mathcal{G}(B_2,a_0,b_0) is not a frame. Furthermore, it is not a frame along the hyperbolas

ab=2k+12(2m+1),ab=\frac{2k+1}{2(2m+1)},

for

b[b0a0km2,b0+a0km2],b\in\left[b_0-a_0\frac{k-m}{2},\,b_0+a_0\frac{k-m}{2}\right],

for every a0a_0 and b0b_0 defined above.

This conjecture proposes that the counterexamples found at isolated parameter pairs extend along specified hyperbolic segments. The supplied text does not establish whether this conjecture has been resolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jakob Lemvig and Kamilla Haahr Nielsen, “Counterexamples to the B-spline conjecture for Gabor frames”, arXiv:1507.03982 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.