Humphreys' weight-cell support-variety conjecture

From papers

Let GG be a semisimple simply connected algebraic group, let Wp+W_p^+ be the dominant right-coset representatives, let c[w]c_{[w]} be the weight cell associated with the right cell [w][w] containing wWp+w\in W_p^+, and let T(λ)T(\lambda) be the indecomposable tilting module of highest weight λ\lambda. For wWp+w\in W_p^+, denote by O[w]\mathcal{O}_{[w]} the nilpotent orbit corresponding to [w][w] under the Lusztig bijection. Humphreys' weight-cell conjecture. If php\geq h and λc[w]X(T)+\lambda\in c_{[w]}\cap X(T)_+ for some wWp+w\in W_p^+, then

VG1(T(λ))=O[w].V_{G_1}(T(\lambda))=\overline{\mathcal{O}_{[w]}}.

This is equivalent to Humphreys' original formulation because tilting modules whose highest weights lie in the same relevant alcove have the same support variety; the source states that the conjecture remains open for all types and also makes sense when p<hp<h.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

William D. Hardesty, “On support varieties and the Humphreys conjecture in type A”, arXiv:1507.00970 (2015).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.