Motivic realization conjecture for the Grothendieck–Teichmüller group

Let K=(Kn)nK_*=(K_n)_n be the tower of motivic groups arising from the moduli spaces M0,n\mathcal{M}_{0,n}, and let RBetti(K)\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{Betti}}(K_*) and RDe Rham(K)\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{De\ Rham}}(K_*) denote its Betti and de Rham realizations. The weight filtration on the KnK_n induces a weight filtration on the motivic Grothendieck–Teichmüller group. Motivic realization conjecture. There are isomorphisms

GTmot(Spec(F))GTAut(RBetti(K)),GT^{\mathrm{mot}}(\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}))\simeq GT\simeq\operatorname{Aut}(\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{Betti}}(K_*)),

and, for the sum of the induced graded pieces denoted by GRTmot(Spec(F))GRT^{\mathrm{mot}}(\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F})),

GRTmot(Spec(F))GRTAut(RDe Rham(K))GRT^{\mathrm{mot}}(\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}))\simeq GRT\simeq\operatorname{Aut}(\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{De\ Rham}}(K_*))

The claim proposes that the motivic and classical Grothendieck–Teichmüller groups, and their graded versions, are recovered as automorphism groups of the corresponding realizations of the KnK_n tower; the source presents this as an expectation and gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ismael Soudères, “A Motivic Grothendieck-Teichmüller Group”, arXiv:1502.05640 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.