The Golod characterization of co-HH moment-angle complexes

At least 11 years old · documented by

Let KK be a simplicial complex. The associated moment-angle complex is (D2,S1)K(D^2,S^1)^K, where (D2,S1)(D^2,S^1) is the standard polyhedral product pair. A simplicial complex KK is Golod if all products and higher Massey products vanish in the appropriate Tor-algebra of its Stanley–Reisner ring.

Golod characterization. The moment-angle complex (D2,S1)K(D^2,S^1)^K is a co-HH-space if and only if KK is Golod.

This conjecture proposes a topological characterization of Golod complexes through the homotopy type of their moment-angle complexes. Considerable work on the homotopy theory of moment-angle complexes over Golod complexes motivates the statement, but its resolution is not specified here.

References

Primary source

Piotr Beben and Jelena Grbić, “Configuration Spaces and Polyhedral Products”, arXiv:1409.4462 (2017).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Open

The full conjecture remains open: it is known for flag complexes and some restricted classes, but no proof or counterexample for arbitrary complexes has been found.

The conjecture asks whether (D2,S1)K(D^2,S^1)^K is a co-HH-space exactly when the simplicial complex KK is Golod. The retrieved literature records substantial partial results, but no resolution for arbitrary KK.

Known results

  • For flag complexes, Beben and Grbić proved the equivalence between Golodness, the co-HH-space condition, and trivial multiplication in positive Tor.
  • For several restricted classes, including triangulated dd-spheres in specified dimensions, results relate mm-Golodness to cat⁡(ZK)≤m\operatorname{cat}(Z_K)\le m.
  • ZKZ_K homotopy equivalent to a suspension implies that KK is Golod; the converse fails, but this does not settle the weaker co-HH question.
  • Wedge-of-spheres and connected-sum decompositions are known in further special cases, without proving the general characterization.

Current status (as of September 2026): The characterization is established for flag complexes and some restricted families, while the equivalence for arbitrary simplicial complexes remains open; no claimed general proof or counterexample was retrieved.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.