The positivity conjecture for hyperbolic formal root coefficients

About 12 years old · traced to

Let v≤wv\le w, let

Φ+∩wΦ−=β1,…,βl,\Phi^+\cap w\Phi^- = \\{\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_l\\},

and set zi=y−βiz_i=y_{-\beta_i}. Let Ivw∘I_{vw_\circ} be a reduced word as above, and let ℓ(v)\ell(v) denote the length of vv. The positivity conjecture. (1) If t=0t=0, then ζIvw∘(ww∘)\zeta_{I_{vw_\circ}}(ww_\circ) is a sum with positive coefficients of terms

u(m−ℓ(v))/2zj1⋯zjm,u^{(m-\ell(v))/2}z_{j_1}\cdots z_{j_m},

where ℓ(v)≤m≤l\ell(v)\le m\le l, m−ℓ(v)m-\ell(v) is even, and 1≤j1<⋯<jm≤l1\le j_1<\cdots<j_m\le l. (2) If t=1t=1, then ζIvw∘(ww∘)\zeta_{I_{vw_\circ}}(ww_\circ) is a sum with positive coefficients of terms

(−1)k−ℓ(v)u(m−k)/2zj1⋯zjm,(-1)^{k-\ell(v)}u^{(m-k)/2}z_{j_1}\cdots z_{j_m},

where ℓ(v)≤k≤m≤l\ell(v)\le k\le m\le l, m−km-k is even, and 1≤j1<⋯<jm≤l1\le j_1<\cdots<j_m\le l. The two assertions are proposed from analogies with the ordinary cohomology and KK-theory formulas and from experimental evidence. They concern positivity at the Lorentz specialization t=0t=0 and the KK-theoretic specialization t=1t=1; no resolution is supplied in the given text.

References

Primary source

Cristian Lenart and Kirill Zainoulline, “Towards generalized cohomology Schubert calculus via formal root polynomials”, arXiv:1408.5952 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.