The compatibility conjecture for Beilinson–Tate and TLF residues

At least 11 years old · documented by

Let KK be an nn-dimensional topological local field over k\boldsymbol{k}. Write obreakΩK/kn↠ΩK/kn,sep obreak\Omega^n_{K / \boldsymbol{k}}\twoheadrightarrow\Omega^{n,\mathrm{sep}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}} for the canonical continuous surjection, and let Res⁡K/kBT\operatorname{Res}^{\mathrm{BT}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}} and Res⁡K/kTLF\operatorname{Res}^{\mathrm{TLF}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}} be the Beilinson–Tate and TLF residue functionals, respectively. The compatibility conjecture. The diagram of k\boldsymbol{k}-linear homomorphisms commutes, equivalently

Res⁡K/kBT=Res⁡K/kTLF∘(ΩK/kn↠ΩK/kn,sep).\operatorname{Res}^{\mathrm{BT}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}}=\operatorname{Res}^{\mathrm{TLF}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}}\circ\bigl(\Omega^n_{K / \boldsymbol{k}}\twoheadrightarrow\Omega^{n,\mathrm{sep}}_{K / \boldsymbol{k}}\bigr).

The conjecture is known for dimensions n≤1n\leq 1: it is trivial for n=0n=0 and follows from Tate's original work for n=1n=1. The higher-dimensional case motivates the review of the TLF residue and its properties in the paper.

References

Primary source

Amnon Yekutieli, “Local Beilinson-Tate Operators”, arXiv:1406.6502 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.