The conjecture on de Rham representations in analytic cohomology of the Lubin–Tate tower

About 12 years old · traced to

Let ρp:GQp→GL⁡2(E)\rho_p:G_{\mathbb{Q}_p}\rightarrow\operatorname{GL}_2(E) be a continuous de Rham Galois representation, and let B(ρp)B(\rho_p) denote the associated pp-adic local Langlands representation. Let MLT,∞\mathcal{M}_{LT,\infty} be the infinite-level Lubin–Tate tower, with analytic cohomology Han1(MLT,∞,OMLT,∞)H^1_{an}(\mathcal{M}_{LT,\infty},\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{M}_{LT,\infty}}) carrying an action of GL⁡2(Qp)\operatorname{GL}_2(\mathbb{Q}_p). Conjecture. There is a non-zero GL⁡2(Qp)\operatorname{GL}_2(\mathbb{Q}_p)-equivariant injection

B(ρp)↪Han1(MLT,∞,OMLT,∞).B(\rho_p)\hookrightarrow H^1_{an}(\mathcal{M}_{LT,\infty},\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{M}_{LT,\infty}}).

This is proposed as a corrected version of the folklore conjecture because the relevant analytic cohomology representation is not admissible, preventing the authors from applying their localization method. The assertion is left as a conjecture for continuous de Rham representations.

References

Primary source

Przemyslaw Chojecki, “On non-abelian Lubin-Tate theory and analytic cohomology”, arXiv:1402.5606 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.