Weak equivariant Beilinson–Burns–Flach conjecture

Let AA act on the motive MM, and let WW be an AA-submodule of HM/OKi+1(M,E(n))H^{i+1}_{\mathcal{M}/\mathcal{O}_K}(M,E(n)). Let rBr_{\mathrm{B}} be the Beilinson regulator, and suppose

rB(W)QRHDi+1(M,ER(n)).r_{\mathrm{B}}(W)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{R}\cong H^{i+1}_{\mathcal{D}}(M,E_{\mathbf{R}}(n)).

Let ϑ(W)\vartheta_\infty(W) and ϑ(W)\vartheta'_\infty(W) be the elements of K0(A,R)K_0(A,\mathbf{R}) arising from the two Deligne-cohomology exact sequences, and let LL^* be the leading term at s=1ns=1-n of the dual equivariant LL-function. Weak equivariant conjecture. There exists such a submodule WW for which

δ^(L(AHi(M),n))=ϑ(W),δ^(L)=ϑ(W).\hat{\delta}(L({}_A H^i(M),n))=\vartheta_\infty(W),\qquad \hat{\delta}(L^*)=\vartheta'_\infty(W).

This is a weakened form used because finite-dimensionality of the full motivic cohomology groups is generally out of reach; it retains the predicted equivariant special-value identities for a suitable submodule.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

François Brunault, “Non-critical equivariant L-values of modular abelian varieties”, arXiv:1402.4495 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.