Naturality conjecture for filtered Seiberg–Witten cobordism maps and ECH

Fix L>0L>0. Let (Xi,λi)(X_i,\lambda_i) be exact symplectic cobordisms from (Yi,λi)(Y^i_-,\lambda^i_-) to (Y+i,λ+i)(Y^i_+,\lambda^i_+), with cobordism-admissible almost complex structures JiJ_i, for i=0,1i=0,1. Suppose there are a 4-dimensional manifold with corners WW, a 11-form λW\lambda_W, and disjoint embedded 33-manifolds with corners Z±WZ_\pm\subset\partial W, together with embeddings fi:WXif_i:W\hookrightarrow X_i satisfying the stated compatibility of the contact forms, containment of all Reeb orbits of action less than LL in fi(Z±)f_i(Z_\pm), and containment of all relevant broken JiJ_i-holomorphic curves in R×int(fi(W))\mathbb{R}\times\operatorname{int}(f_i(W)).

Naturality conjecture. The diagram of filtered Seiberg–Witten Floer cohomology groups, with horizontal maps given by the chain maps of and vertical maps given by the canonical identifications of monopoles with ECH generators of action at most LL inside Z±Z_\pm, is commutative.

This conjecture would show that the cobordism maps used to define the ECH isomorphisms are independent of the embedding data, and hence that the resulting direct-limit isomorphism is canonical. Although the conjecture is open, the paper proves enough cases in its appendix to remove the potential dependence on the embedding data.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Cagatay Kutluhan, Steven Sivek and C. H. Taubes, “Sutured ECH is a natural invariant”, arXiv:1312.3600 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.