The affinoid–analytic equality for multivariate Robba rings

Let GG act continuously on A~L,r\tilde{\mathbf{A}}^{\dagger,r}_{L_\infty}, and let A~K,r,aff\tilde{\mathbf{A}}^{\dagger,r,\operatorname{aff}}_{K_\infty} be the subring of elements admitting an affinoid model, while A~K,r,an\tilde{\mathbf{A}}^{\dagger,r,\operatorname{an}}_{K_\infty} is the subset of uniformly rr-analytic elements for the action of GG. Affinoid–analytic equality. One has

A~K,r,aff=A~K,r,an.\tilde{\mathbf{A}}^{\dagger,r,\operatorname{aff}}_{K_\infty}=\tilde{\mathbf{A}}^{\dagger,r,\operatorname{an}}_{K_\infty}.

The inclusion from left to right is known; the conjecture asserts the converse. Its difficulty is the lack of an obvious construction of GG-stable affinoid models, although such models can be constructed when KK_\infty is the division field of a formal group, with possible extensions to certain arithmetic dynamical systems.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kiran S. Kedlaya, “Frobenius modules over multivariate Robba rings”, arXiv:1311.7468 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.