Cellularity conjecture for the mirabolic Hecke algebra

At least 12 years old · documented by

Let Hn(1,0;q)H_n(1,0;q) be the Hecke algebra with its cellular basis indexed by standard bitableaux, and let [?][?] denote the quotient algebra with basis elements Cˉs,tλ‾\bar{C}^{\underline{\lambda}}_{\mathfrak{s},\mathfrak{t}}. Define

Λ′(n)={(λ1,λ2)∈Λ(n)∣λ2 is a single column}.\Lambda'(n)=\{(\lambda^1,\lambda^2)\in\Lambda(n)\mid \lambda^2\text{ is a single column}\}.

Cellularity conjecture. The elements

{Cˉs,tλ‾∣λ‾∈Λ′(n)}\{\bar{C}^{\underline{\lambda}}_{\mathfrak{s},\mathfrak{t}}\mid\underline{\lambda}\in\Lambda'(n)\}

are a cellular basis for Rn(q)\mathcal{R}_n(q), so Rn(q)\mathcal{R}_n(q) is a cellular algebra.

This would identify the quotient's natural images of the Hecke algebra's cellular basis as a cellular basis indexed by the specified bipartitions. The supplied text gives a strategy involving reduction of basis elements indexed outside Λ′(n)\Lambda'(n), but does not establish the conjecture.

References

Primary source

Daniele Rosso, “The mirabolic Hecke algebra”, arXiv:1310.3878 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.