Bridgeland stability conjecture for the double tilt of an abelian threefold

About 15 years old · traced to

Let XX be an abelian threefold, let B∈NS⁡R(X)B\in\operatorname{NS}_{\mathbb{R}}(X), and let ω∈NS⁡R(X)\omega\in\operatorname{NS}_{\mathbb{R}}(X) be an ample class. With Bω,B\mathcal{B}_{\omega,B} the tilt of Coh⁡(X)\operatorname{Coh}(X) at the μω,B\mu_{\omega,B}-torsion pair, define νω,B\nu_{\omega,B} as above, let Tω,B′=HN⁡ω,Bν(0,+∞]\mathcal{T}'_{\omega,B}=\operatorname{HN}^{\nu}_{\omega,B}(0,+\infty] and Fω,B′=HN⁡ω,Bν(−∞,0]\mathcal{F}'_{\omega,B}=\operatorname{HN}^{\nu}_{\omega,B}(-\infty,0], and set Aω,B=⟨Fω,B′[1],Tω,B′⟩⊂Db(X)\mathcal{A}_{\omega,B}=\langle\mathcal{F}'_{\omega,B}[1],\mathcal{T}'_{\omega,B}\rangle\subset D^b(X). The central charge is Zω,BZ_{\omega,B}. Bridgeland stability conjecture. The pair (Zω,B,Aω,B)(Z_{\omega,B},\mathcal{A}_{\omega,B}) is a Bridgeland stability condition on Db(X)D^b(X). This is the original threefold stability conjecture of Bayer, Macrì, and Toda; it is equivalent, under the rationality and Noetherian hypotheses described in the source, to the Bogomolov–Gieseker type inequality in the next row.

References

Primary source

Antony Maciocia and Dulip Piyaratne, “Fourier-Mukai Transforms and Bridgeland Stability Conditions on Abelian Threefolds II”, arXiv:1310.0299 (2015).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2011–2013). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1103.5010.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.