Optimal error estimate for the optimization-based atomistic-to-continuum method

About 13 years old · traced to

Let uˉatc\bar{u}^{\rm atc} be the atomistic-to-continuum approximation, let uˉ\bar{u} be the exact solution, let L\mathcal{L} be the computational lattice, let Lc\mathcal{L}_{\rm c} be the continuum region, let hh denote the finite-element mesh size, and let D2uˉ:=(DρDσuˉ)ρ,σ∈RD^2\bar{u}:=(D_\rho D_\sigma\bar{u})_{\rho,\sigma\in\mathcal{R}}. Error estimate. The energy-norm error satisfies

∥Duˉatc−Duˉ∥ℓ2(L)2≲∥Duˉ∥ℓ2(Zd∖L)2+∥hD2uˉ∥ℓ2(Lc)2=:err2.\|D \bar{u}^{\rm atc} - D \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathcal{L})}^2 \lesssim \|D \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathbb{Z}^d\setminus\mathcal{L})}^2 + \|h D^2 \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathcal{L}_{\rm c})}^2 =:{\rm err}^2.

Here X≲YX\lesssim Y means that there exists a constant c>0c>0 such that X≤cYX\leq cY. This predicts that the coupling error is dominated by the domain-truncation and continuum-modeling errors; numerical simulations with a next-nearest-neighbor Lennard–Jones model are reported to support the prediction, but no rigorous proof is supplied here.

References

Primary source

Derek Olson, Pavel Bochev, Mitchell Luskin and Alexander V. Shapeev, “Development of an Optimization-Based Atomistic-to-Continuum Coupling Method”, arXiv:1309.5988 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.