Optimal error estimate for the optimization-based atomistic-to-continuum method

Let uˉatc\bar{u}^{\rm atc} be the atomistic-to-continuum approximation, let uˉ\bar{u} be the exact solution, let L\mathcal{L} be the computational lattice, let Lc\mathcal{L}_{\rm c} be the continuum region, let hh denote the finite-element mesh size, and let D2uˉ:=(DρDσuˉ)ρ,σRD^2\bar{u}:=(D_\rho D_\sigma\bar{u})_{\rho,\sigma\in\mathcal{R}}. Error estimate. The energy-norm error satisfies

DuˉatcDuˉ2(L)2Duˉ2(ZdL)2+hD2uˉ2(Lc)2=:err2.\|D \bar{u}^{\rm atc} - D \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathcal{L})}^2 \lesssim \|D \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathbb{Z}^d\setminus\mathcal{L})}^2 + \|h D^2 \bar{u}\|_{\ell^2(\mathcal{L}_{\rm c})}^2 =:{\rm err}^2.

Here XYX\lesssim Y means that there exists a constant c>0c>0 such that XcYX\leq cY. This predicts that the coupling error is dominated by the domain-truncation and continuum-modeling errors; numerical simulations with a next-nearest-neighbor Lennard–Jones model are reported to support the prediction, but no rigorous proof is supplied here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Derek Olson, Pavel Bochev, Mitchell Luskin and Alexander V. Shapeev, “Development of an Optimization-Based Atomistic-to-Continuum Coupling Method”, arXiv:1309.5988 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.