The Kloosterman-sum identity conjecture for the auxiliary sum Km′K_m'

About 22 years old · traced to

Let mm be odd and let kk satisfy gcd⁡(k,m)=1\operatorname{gcd}(k,m)=1. Define

f(v)=(v2k+1)v2k(v2k+v)2k+1,f(v)=\frac{(v^{2^k}+1)v^{2^k}}{(v^{2^k}+v)^{2^k+1}},

with f(0)=f(1)=0f(0)=f(1)=0, and define

Km′=∑x∈GF⁡(2m)∗(−1)Tr⁡m(f(v)).K_m'=\sum\limits_{x\in \operatorname{GF}(2^m)^*}(-1)^{\operatorname{Tr}_m(f(v))}.

Kloosterman-sum identity conjecture.

Km′=Km.K_m'=K_m.

Here KmK_m is the Kloosterman sum ∑x∈GF⁡(2m)∗(−1)Tr⁡m(x+x−1)\sum_{x\in\operatorname{GF}(2^m)^*}(-1)^{\operatorname{Tr}_m(x+x^{-1})}. This is the second exponential-sum conjecture on which the proposed settlement of the relevant cross-correlation distribution depends. The source gives no evidence of resolution, so its status is open.

References

Primary source

Xiaogang Liu, Michael Harrison and Yuan Luo, “A note on the five valued conjectures of Johansen and Helleseth and zeta functions”, arXiv:1309.5674 (2013).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2004–2013). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0406330.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.