The almost-commuting Laplacians conjecture

Let L1\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1 and L2\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2 be Laplacian matrices. Let J(L1,L2)J(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2) measure their commutator, let C(L1,L2)=J(L1,L2)C(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2)=J(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2), and let CL(L1,L2)C_L(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2) denote the corresponding distance between the Laplacians and the nearest commuting Laplacians with the same structure.

Almost-commuting Laplacians conjecture. There exists a function δ(ϵ)\delta(\epsilon) satisfying

limϵ0δ(ϵ)=0,\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}\delta(\epsilon)=0,

such that

CL(L1,L2)δ(J(L1,L2)).C_L(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2)\leq \delta\bigl(J(\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_1,\boldsymbol{\mathrm{L}}_2)\bigr).

Equivalently, almost-commuting Laplacians should be close to commuting Laplacians. The paper gives empirical evidence from random Laplacian pairs, while noting that the relevant generalization of Lin's theorem remains a subject for future theoretical research; the conjecture is refuted according to the supplied status evidence.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Michael M. Bronstein, Klaus Glashoff and Terry A. Loring, “Making Laplacians commute”, arXiv:1307.6549 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.