The equality conjecture for hypergeometric logarithmic quotients

Let n2n\ne2 and let ai,biQa_i,b_i\in\mathbb{Q} satisfy 0<ai,bi<10<a_i,b_i<1 for i=1,2,,ni=1,2,\ldots,n. Let F(az)F(a\mid z) be the generalized hypergeometric solution and let G(az)G(a\mid z) be its first logarithmic solution, with analogous notation for bb. The equality conjecture for logarithmic quotients. The formal power series identity

G(b1,b2,,bnz)F(b1,b2,,bnz)=G(a1,a2,,anz)F(a1,a2,,anz)\frac{G(b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n\mid z)}{F(b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n\mid z)}=\frac{G(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\mid z)}{F(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\mid z)}

holds if and only if

{b1,b2,,bn}={a1,a2,,an}.\{b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n\}=\{a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\}.

The conjecture is used to characterize the parameter sets giving equal logarithmic quotients and to complete the converse direction of the integrality criterion. It is false over C\mathbb{C}, since the associated variety has extra components; the remaining arithmetic assertion is that these extra components have no nontrivial Q\mathbb{Q}-rational points.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hossein Movasati and Khosro Monsef Shokri, “Modular-type functions attached to Calabi-Yau varieties: integrality properties”, arXiv:1306.5662 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.