Positivity and periodicity conjecture for the WZW fusion-ring elements Wm(a)W^{(a)}_m

About 13 years old · traced to

Let II be the node set, let tat_a and h∨h^{\vee} be the parameters associated with the Dynkin diagram, and let Wm(a)W^{(a)}_m be the elements of the WZW fusion ring defined from the unrestricted QQ-system. For a∈Ia\in I, let τa∈O(g^)\tau_a\in O(\hat{\mathfrak{g}}) and σa=e−2πin(τaω^0∣ρ)\sigma_a=e^{-2\pi i n (\tau_a\hat{\omega}_0|\rho)} be as in the paper's tables. Positivity and periodicity conjecture. For every a∈Ia\in I, the following properties hold: (i) Wm(a)W^{(a)}_m is positive for 0≤m≤tak0\le m\le t_a k; (ii) Wtak−m(a)=τa(Wm(a)∗)W^{(a)}_{t_a k-m}=\tau_a(W^{(a)*}_m) for 0≤m≤tak0\le m\le t_a k; (iii) Wtak(a)=Vk(τaω^0)W^{(a)}_{t_a k}=V_{k(\tau_a\hat{\omega}_0)}; (iv) Wtak+1(a)=Wtak+2(a)=⋯=Wta(k+h∨)−1(a)=0W^{(a)}_{t_a k+1}=W^{(a)}_{t_a k+2}=\cdots=W^{(a)}_{t_a(k+h^{\vee})-1}=0; and (v) Wm+nta(k+h∨)(a)=σanτanWm(a)W^{(a)}_{m+nt_a(k+h^{\vee})}=\sigma_a^n\tau_a^nW^{(a)}_m for 0≤m≤ta(k+h∨)−10\le m\le t_a(k+h^{\vee})-1 and n∈Z≥0n\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge0}. These assertions predict positivity, a duality relation, vanishing beyond the boundary, and twisted periodicity for the QQ-system solution in the WZW fusion ring. Positivity is established in the paper for types AA, BB, CC, and DD in the range 0≤m≤⌊tak/2⌋0\le m\le\lfloor t_a k/2\rfloor; the full collection of properties is presented as the main conjecture and is not resolved in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Chul-hee Lee, “Positivity and periodicity of Q-systems in the WZW fusion ring”, arXiv:1302.1467 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.