Diagonal dominance conjecture for squared components of a truncated normal vector
Diagonal dominance conjecture for squared components of a truncated normal vector
Let , where , and let
be the Euclidean ball of radius . Consider the covariance matrix of the vector conditional on . Diagonal dominance conjecture. This covariance matrix is diagonally dominant: for every ,
for all . The claim is presented as an unproved exercise concerning the relative amplitudes of variances and covariances under weak truncation; no resolution is supplied in the source.
Progress summary
No public source found that proves or disproves the conjecture, although related work establishes some weaker covariance inequalities.
The conjecture says that, after a centered Gaussian vector is restricted to a Euclidean ball, the covariance matrix of its squared coordinates has each diagonal entry at least as large as the total absolute size of the other entries in its row. The available source presents this as an unproved exercise and supplies no resolution.
Known results
- A related paper records that distinct squared-coordinate covariances are nonpositive under ball truncation.
- The same paper records a separate upper bound for each squared-coordinate variance and refers to a complete proof of those two weaker inequalities.
- Neither result implies the conjectured row-sum inequality.
Current status (as of August 2026): the conjecture remains open in the retrieved record; nonpositive off-diagonal covariances and a separate variance bound are known, but diagonal dominance itself has no verified proof or counterexample.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Filippo Palombi and Simona Toti, “A note on the variance of the square components of a normal multivariate within a Euclidean ball”, arXiv:1211.1614 (2013).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Proof (with a dimension-uniform strict improvement). Let be independent centered Gaussian variables with variances , write , , and condition throughout on , where is the squared truncation radius. Set . In fact, for every ,
Thus the conjectured weak diagonal dominance holds strictly, with a quantitative gap independent of and all the variances.
Known ingredients and attribution. Mukerjee and Ong, J. Multivariate Anal. 139 (2015), 1–6, DOI , proved the distinct pairwise inequalities for , and proved that the distribution function of any positive weighted sum of independent chi-square variables is log-concave. Their paper does not state or prove the diagonal-dominance conjecture; the following argument supplies the missing row-sum inequality.
Fix , assume , and put
For , integration by parts gives
Log-concavity of implies
and therefore
Independence now yields
so . Consequently,
Together with the established for , this already proves strict diagonal dominance.
For the uniform quantitative improvement, let . Rescaling the complementary Gaussian integral gives
where . The integral is decreasing in , and hence
It follows that
For independent copies from the conditional law of ,
Accordingly,
proving the displayed bound. For , the off-diagonal sum is empty and .
Original conjecture: Palombi and Toti, J. Multivariate Anal. 122 (2013), Conjecture 4.1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1614. Previously proved pairwise/log-concavity ingredients: Mukerjee and Ong, https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6018.