The quantum Langlands equivalence for the metaplectic symplectic group

Let XX be a smooth projective curve, let n1n\geq 1, let G=Sp(Mn)G=\operatorname{Sp}(M_n) with Mn=OXnΩnM_n={\cal O}_X^n\oplus\Omega^n, and let H=SO2n+1H=\operatorname{SO}_{2n+1}. Write BunH\operatorname{Bun}_H for the moduli stack of HH-bundles and Bun~G\operatorname{\widetilde{Bun}}_G for the metaplectic gerbe over BunG\operatorname{Bun}_G. Let D(Bun~G)\operatorname{D}_-(\operatorname{\widetilde{Bun}}_G) be the derived category on which the metaplectic involution acts by 1-1, and let ϵˉ\bar\epsilon denote the automorphism induced by 1-1 on the symplectic bundle.

Quantum Langlands conjecture. There is an equivalence

QL:D(BunH),~,D(Bun~G)QL: \operatorname{D}(\operatorname{Bun}_H)\\,\widetilde\to\\,\operatorname{D}_-(\operatorname{\widetilde{Bun}}_G)

\ncommuting with the actions of Rep(Sp2n)\operatorname{Rep}(\operatorname{Sp}_{2n}) by Hecke functors. Under this equivalence, the grading of D(BunH)\operatorname{D}(\operatorname{Bun}_H) by the connected components of BunH\operatorname{Bun}_H corresponds to the grading of D(Bun~G)\operatorname{D}_-(\operatorname{\widetilde{Bun}}_G) by the action of ϵˉ\bar\epsilon.

This is the specialization of the quantum Langlands conjecture to the dual pair (H,G)(H,G); the statement is presented as conjectural in the source, and no resolution is supplied.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sergey Lysenko, “Geometric Whittaker models and Eisenstein series for Mp_2”, arXiv:1211.1596 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.