The safety-bound conjecture for Segre varieties

Let X=\mathbbmPn1××\mathbbmPnkX=\mathbbm{P}^{n_1}\times\dots\times\mathbbm{P}^{n_k} be a Segre variety with n1nkn_1\leq\dots\leq n_k. Let O\mathscr{O}_- and O+\mathscr{O}_+ be the safety bounds of XX, and let T(n1,,nk;nk;0,,0,ak)T(n_1,\dots,n_k;n_k;0,\dots,0,a_k) be the statement of room R\mathscr{R} appearing below.

Safety-bound conjecture. The following statements hold:

  • The two safety bounds are symmetric:
O=O+.\mathscr{O}_-=-\mathscr{O}_+.
  • The positive safety bound is
O+=(i=1k1ni1)nk.\mathscr{O}_+=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}n_i-1\right)n_k.
  • If
ak=i=1k1(ni+1)(nk+1)0,a_k=\prod_{i=1}^{k-1}(n_i+1)-(n_k+1)\geq0,

then the statement T(n1,,nk;nk;0,,0,ak)T(n_1,\dots,n_k;n_k;0,\dots,0,a_k) has room R=O\mathscr{R}=\mathscr{O}_- and is false.

The conjecture is suggested by explicit computations of low-dimensional Segre varieties and by the observed agreement of the positive and negative safety bounds with the stated formula. Its general validity, including the final assertion about the statement TT, remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Fulvio Gesmundo, “An asymptotic bound for secant varieties of Segre varieties”, arXiv:1209.1732 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.