The parabolic-Whittaker geometric equivalence

Let PP be a parabolic subgroup of GG, let QQ be another parabolic subgroup, and let DIWQ(FP)D_{IW_Q}({{\mathcal F}\ell}_P) be the corresponding category of partial Whittaker sheaves on the partial affine flag variety. Let Q ˇ{Q\check{\ }} and P ˇ{P\check{\ }} be the corresponding parabolic subgroups of G ˇ{ G\check{\ }}, and define

g~Q ˇ={(q,x)xq},N~P ˇ={(p,x)xrad(p)}.\tilde{{\frak g}}_{Q\check{\ }}=\{({\frak q},x)\mid x\in{\frak q}\},\qquad {\tilde{\mathcal N}}_{P\check{\ }}=\{({\frak p},x)\mid x\in\operatorname{rad}({\frak p})\}.

Then the parabolic-Whittaker equivalence conjecture. There is a canonical equivalence

DIWQ(FP)Db(CohG ˇ(g~Q ˇ×g ˇN~P ˇ)).D_{IW_Q}({{\mathcal F}\ell}_P)\cong D^b\left(\operatorname{Coh}^{ G\check{\ }}(\tilde{{\frak g}}_{Q\check{\ }}\times_{ {\frak g\check{\ }}}{\tilde{\mathcal N}}_{P\check{\ }})\right).

This conjecture proposes a geometric description of partial Whittaker categories in terms of coherent sheaves on a fiber product of parabolic and nilpotent resolutions, generalizing the equivalences discussed earlier in the paper.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Roman Bezrukavnikov, “On two geometric realizations of an affine Hecke algebra”, arXiv:1209.0403 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.