Hooley's Riemann hypothesis for cubic six-variable Hasse–Weil L-functions

Let g(x)=x13++x63\mathfrak g({\mathbf x})=x_1^3+\cdots+x_6^3, let Δ(m)\Delta({\mathbf m}) be the associated discriminant, and let ξ(m;s)\xi({\mathbf m};s) be the completed modified Hasse–Weil LL-function defined from the point-counting errors of the projective variety g(x)=mx=0\mathfrak g({\mathbf x})={\mathbf m}\cdot{\mathbf x}=0. Suppose that

Δ(m)0.\Delta({\mathbf m})\ne 0.

HRH. The function ξ(m;s)\xi({\mathbf m};s) has a meromorphic continuation to C\mathbb C of finite order, with only possible poles at s=32s=\frac{3}{2} and s=52s=\frac{5}{2}; there is a sign w(m)=±1w({\mathbf m})=\pm1 such that

ξ(m;s)=w(m)ξ(m;4s);\xi({\mathbf m};s)=w({\mathbf m})\xi({\mathbf m};4-s);

and, when Re(s)2\operatorname{Re}(s)\ne2, one has ξ(m;s)0\xi({\mathbf m};s)\ne0. This hypothesis would provide the conditional treatment of the (l,m,n)=(5,5,2)(l,m,n)=(5,5,2) systems of type D, for which the paper does not give an unconditional treatment.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Joerg Bruedern and Trevor D. Wooley, “Subconvexity for additive equations: pairs of undenary cubic forms”, arXiv:1208.2176 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.