The factorization conjecture for Marton's inner bound

From papers

Let q(y,zx)\mathfrak{q}(y,z\mid x) be a broadcast channel. Define

T(X):=maxp(u,vx)I(U;Y)+I(V;Z)I(U;V)T(X):=\max_{p(u,v\mid x)} I(U;Y)+I(V;Z)-I(U;V)

and let C[f(X)]\mathfrak{C}[f(X)] denote the upper concave envelope of ff at p(x)p(x). For a product of two broadcast channels, write T(X1,X2)T(X_1,X_2) for the analogous quantity with outputs (Y1,Y2)(Y_1,Y_2) and (Z1,Z2)(Z_1,Z_2), and put λˉ=1λ\bar\lambda=1-\lambda.

Factorization conjecture. For all product channels, all λ[0,1]\lambda\in[0,1], and all p(x1,x2)p(x_1,x_2),

λH(Y1,Y2)λˉH(Z1,Z2)+T(X1,X2)-\lambda H(Y_1,Y_2)-\bar\lambda H(Z_1,Z_2)+T(X_1,X_2) C[λH(Y1)λˉH(Z1)+T(X1)]+C[λH(Y2)λˉH(Z2)+T(X2)].\leq \mathfrak{C}[-\lambda H(Y_1)-\bar\lambda H(Z_1)+T(X_1)] +\mathfrak{C}[-\lambda H(Y_2)-\bar\lambda H(Z_2)+T(X_2)].

The conjecture would imply that Marton's inner bound is optimal for the sum-rate of two-receiver discrete memoryless broadcast channels. It has been established for the endpoint values of λ\lambda, when one component channel is deterministic, and when one receiver in a component is more capable than the other; the general statement was subsequently established in the cited work.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Amin Gohari, Chandra Nair and Venkat Anantharam, “On Marton's inner bound for broadcast channels”, arXiv:1202.0898 (2012).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.