The non-vanishing conjecture for log canonical pairs

Work over the complex numbers, and let K\mathbb{K} be either R\mathbb{R} or Q\mathbb{Q}. Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective log canonical pair such that Δ\Delta is an effective K\mathbb{K}-divisor and KX+ΔK_X+\Delta is pseudo-effective.

Non-vanishing conjecture. There exists an effective K\mathbb{K}-divisor DD such that

DKKX+Δ.D\sim_{\mathbb{K}}K_X+\Delta.

The conjecture is stated as an important step toward the abundance conjecture and is automatically true when the log canonical divisor is big. The source emphasizes the distinction between the cases K=Q\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{Q} and K=R\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{R}, especially for constructing minimal models with real boundaries; no resolution status is supplied.

Equivalent formulations 2

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Non-vanishing conjecture for log canonical pairs

    Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective log canonical pair. Non-vanishing conjecture. If KX+ΔK_X+\Delta is pseudo-effective, then there exists an effective R\mathbb{R}-divisor DD such that

    DRKX+Δ.D\sim_{\mathbb{R}}K_X+\Delta.

    The conjecture asks for an effective representative of a pseudo-effective log canonical divisor. It is a basic existence statement in the minimal model program and is used in the paper as a step toward abundance and good minimal models.

    source: Osamu Fujino and Yoshinori Gongyo, “On log canonical rings”, arXiv:1302.5194 (2013).

  2. Non-vanishing conjecture for log canonical pairs

    Let (X/Z,B)(X/Z,B) be an lc pair. The relative real linear system (KX+B)/ZR|(K_X+B)/Z|_{\mathbb{R}} is nonempty whenever KX+BK_X+B is pseudo-effective over ZZ.

    Non-vanishing conjecture. If KX+BK_X+B is pseudo-effective over ZZ, then

    (KX+B)/ZR.|(K_X+B)/Z|_{\mathbb{R}}\not=\emptyset.

    This conjecture concerns the existence of effective representatives of pseudo-effective log canonical divisors in the relative setting. The supplied text uses it as an assumption in a main theorem, but gives no evidence of a resolution, so its status is left open.

    source: Guodu Chen, Jingjun Han and Jihao Liu, “Uniform rational polytopes for Iitaka dimensions”, arXiv:2208.04663 (2022).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yoshinori Gongyo, “Remarks on the non-vanishing conjecture”, arXiv:1201.1128 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.