Bethe permanent lifting bound conjecture

About 15 years old · traced to

Let θ\boldsymbol{\theta} be a non-negative n×nn\times n matrix. For M∈Z>0M\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}, let Ψ~M\tilde{\Psi}_M be the set of degree-MM graph-covering permutations and let θ↑P~\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\uparrow\tilde{{\bm{P}}}} denote the matrix lifted according to P~\tilde{{\bm{P}}}. Then perm⁡(θ↑P~)\operatorname{perm}(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\uparrow\tilde{{\bm{P}}}}) is defined for every P~∈Ψ~M\tilde{{\bm{P}}}\in\tilde{\Psi}_M. Bethe permanent lifting bound conjecture. For any M∈Z>0M\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0},

⟨ ⁣perm⁡(θ↑P~) ⁣⟩P~∈Ψ~M⩽(perm⁡(θ))M.\Big\langle \! \operatorname{perm}\left(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\uparrow\tilde{{\bm{P}}}}\right)\!\Big\rangle_{\tilde{{\bm{P}}}\in\tilde{\Psi}_M}\leqslant\big(\operatorname{perm}(\boldsymbol{\theta})\big)^M.

Possibly the stronger pointwise inequality

perm⁡(θ↑P~)⩽(perm⁡(θ))M\operatorname{perm}\left(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\uparrow\tilde{{\bm{P}}}}\right)\leqslant\big(\operatorname{perm}(\boldsymbol{\theta})\big)^M

holds for every M∈Z>0M\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0} and every P~∈Ψ~M\tilde{{\bm{P}}}\in\tilde{\Psi}_M. The weaker form would imply the claimed upper bound on the Bethe permanent; the conjecture is verified for the all-one matrix and for the matrices studied through finite graph covers, but remains open in general.

References

Primary source

Pascal O. Vontobel, “The Bethe Permanent of a Non-Negative Matrix”, arXiv:1107.4196 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.