The factorized vertex-operator matrix-element conjecture

At least 14 years old · documented by

Let u=(u1,…,um)\mathbf{u}=(u_1,\ldots,u_m) and v=(v1,…,vm)\mathbf{v}=(v_1,\ldots,v_m), and let Φ(w)=Φuv(w):Fu→Fv\Phi(w)=\Phi_{\mathbf{u}}^{\mathbf{v}}(w):\mathcal{F}_{\mathbf{u}}\to\mathcal{F}_{\mathbf{v}} be the vertex operator defined by its vacuum normalization and intertwining relation with the Ding–Iohara algebra. Let ∣Kλ>\left|K_{\boldsymbol \lambda}\right> and <Kλ∣\left<K_{\boldsymbol \lambda}\right| denote the integral forms. Factorized vertex-operator conjecture. (1) The operator Φ(w)\Phi(w) exists uniquely. (2) Its matrix elements satisfy

<Kλ∣Φ(w)∣Kμ>=((−1)m(t/q)mem(u)em(v)w)∣λ∣((t/q)em(v)w)−∣μ∣\left<K_{\boldsymbol \lambda}\right|\Phi(w)\left|K_{\boldsymbol \mu}\right> = \left((-1)^m(t/q)^m e_m(\mathbf{u})e_m(\mathbf{v})w\right)^{|{\boldsymbol \lambda}|}\left((t/q)e_m(\mathbf{v})w\right)^{-|{\boldsymbol \mu}|} ×∏k=1mvk−(m−1)∣λ(k)∣uk∣μ(k)∣q−(m−1)n(λ(k)′)+n(μ(k)′)t(m−1)n(λ(k))−n(μ(k))∏i,j=1mNλ(i),μ(j)(qvi/(tuj)).\times\prod_{k=1}^m v_k^{-(m-1)|\lambda^{(k)}|}u_k^{|\mu^{(k)}|}q^{-(m-1)n(\lambda^{(k)'})+n(\mu^{(k)'})}t^{(m-1)n(\lambda^{(k)})-n(\mu^{(k)})} \prod_{i,j=1}^mN_{\lambda^{(i)},\mu^{(j)}}(qv_i/(tu_j)).

This conjecture proposes both existence and uniqueness of the higher-level vertex operator and a Nekrasov-factorized formula for its integral-basis matrix elements; no resolution is given in the source.

References

Primary source

H. Awata, B. Feigin, A. Hoshino, M. Kanai, J. Shiraishi and S. Yanagida, “Notes on Ding-Iohara algebra and AGT conjecture”, arXiv:1106.4088 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.