Polynomial approximation conjecture for active exterior acoustic cloaking

About 15 years old · traced to

Let c∗=(β,0){\bf c}^*=(\beta,0) be as in the proof of Theorem~. For L>0L>0, define

Dβ,L={z∈C:∣z−β∣L∣z∣<βL+1LL(L+1)L+1}.D_{\beta,L}=\left\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z-\beta|^L|z|<\frac{\beta^{L+1}L^L}{(L+1)^{L+1}}\right\}.

Let S1S_1 be any disk in the connected component of Dβ,LD_{\beta,L} containing the origin, and let S2S_2 be any disk in the connected component of Dβ,LD_{\beta,L} containing c∗{\bf c}^*. For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there exist positive integers ss and nn such that

∣sn−L∣<ϵ\left|\frac{s}{n}-L\right|<\epsilon

and the polynomial

Pn,s(z)=(1−zβ)s∑j=0n−1(zβ)j(s+j−1j)P_{n,s}(z)=\left(1-\frac{z}{\beta}\right)^s\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\left(\frac{z}{\beta}\right)^j\binom{s+j-1}{j}

satisfies

∣Pn,s−1∣<ϵon ∂S1,∣Pn,s∣<ϵon ∂S2.|P_{n,s}-1|<\epsilon\quad\text{on }\partial S_1, \qquad |P_{n,s}|<\epsilon\quad\text{on }\partial S_2.

Moreover, the approximation property referred to in the source is not satisfied when either S1S_1 or S2S_2 is not contained in Dβ,LD_{\beta,L}. Polynomial approximation conjecture. The stated approximation property holds precisely for disks contained in the specified connected components of Dβ,LD_{\beta,L}, and fails when either disk is not contained in Dβ,LD_{\beta,L}. This conjecture would extend the authors' earlier explicit polynomial cloaking results by allowing greater freedom in the location and size of the cloaked region; the source reports numerical evidence but does not provide a proof.

References

Primary source

Fernando Guevara Vasquez, Graeme W. Milton, Daniel Onofrei and Pierre Seppecher, “Transformation elastodynamics and active exterior acoustic cloaking”, arXiv:1105.1221 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.