MNOP Gromov–Witten/Donaldson–Thomas correspondence

About 20 years old · traced to

Let XX be a Calabi–Yau 33-fold. Define the Gromov–Witten generating series by

GW(X)=∑g≥0, β>0Ng,βGWλ2g−2tβ,\mathrm{GW}(X)=\sum_{g\geq 0,\,\beta>0}N^{\rm GW}_{g,\beta}\lambda^{2g-2}t^\beta,

and the reduced Donaldson–Thomas series by DT′(X)=DT(X)/DT0(X)\mathop{\rm DT}\nolimits'(X)=\mathop{\rm DT}\nolimits(X)/\mathop{\rm DT}\nolimits_0(X). MNOP Gromov–Witten/Donaldson–Thomas correspondence. After the variable change q=−eiλq=-e^{i\lambda},

exp⁡(GW(X))=DT′(X).\exp(\mathrm{GW}(X))=\mathop{\rm DT}\nolimits'(X).

The correspondence relates the generally rational Gromov–Witten theory to the integer-valued Donaldson–Thomas theory and is expected to imply hidden integrality of Gromov–Witten invariants.

References

Primary source

Yukinobu Toda, “Stability conditions and curve counting invariants on Calabi-Yau 3-folds”, arXiv:1103.4229 (2011).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2006–2011). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0601257.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.