Extension of an independence relation to the lovely-pair structure
Extension of an independence relation to the lovely-pair structure
Let be the monster structure, let be the distinguished predicate defining the lovely-pair structure , and let mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{}}\,\,\,\,}} be the given independence relation. Write mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{}}\,\,\,\,}}_P for its localization over .
Extension conjecture for lovely pairs. There exists an independence relation mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{2}}\,\,\,\,}} on such that:
- mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{2}}\,\,\,\,}} coincides with mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{}}\,\,\,\,}} on subsets of ;
- mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{2}}\,\,\,\,}}_P=mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{}}\,\,\,\,}}_P.
The proposition immediately before the candidate shows that the localized relation mathop{\mathpalette\Ind{}^{\!\!\!\!\rlap{\scriptscriptstyle\textnormal{}}\,\,\,\,}}_P is already an independence relation on , with the same local-character constant, and preserves property (*). Thus the conjectural extension is closely related to the localization construction, but the stated existence claim itself should be checked against that proposition.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Antongiulio Fornasiero, “Lovely pairs for independence relations”, arXiv:1009.5244 (2010).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.