The Topological Monodromy Conjecture for hypersurfaces

About 17 years old · traced to

Let f∈C[x1,…,xn]f\in\mathbf{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] be a non-constant polynomial with f(0)=0f(0)=0, let μ:Y→Cn\mu:Y\to\mathbf{C}^n be a log resolution of f−1(0)f^{-1}(0), and write

Ztop⁡,f(s)=∑I⊆Sχ(EI∘∩μ−1(0))∏i∈I1ais+ki+1Z_{\operatorname{top},f}(s)=\sum_{I\subseteq S}\chi(E_I^{\circ}\cap\mu^{-1}(0))\prod_{i\in I}\frac{1}{a_i s+k_i+1}

for its local topological zeta function. For x∈f−1(0)x\in f^{-1}(0), let Mf,xM_{f,x} be the Milnor fiber of ff at xx, and let bf(s)b_f(s) be the Bernstein–Sato polynomial of ff. Topological Monodromy Conjecture. If cc is a pole of Ztop⁡,f(s)Z_{\operatorname{top},f}(s), then (a) exp⁡(2πic)\exp(2\pi i c) is an eigenvalue of the monodromy action on Hi(Mf,x,C)H^i(M_{f,x},\mathbf{C}) for some ii and some x∈f−1(0)x\in f^{-1}(0), and (b) bf(c)=0b_f(c)=0. The conjecture links poles of the topological zeta function with monodromy and Bernstein–Sato data; the paper proves the monodromy assertion for hyperplane arrangements and reduces the Bernstein–Sato assertion in that setting to the conjecture below.

References

Primary source

Nero Budur, Mircea Mustata and Zach Teitler, “The Monodromy Conjecture for hyperplane arrangements”, arXiv:0906.1991 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.