The Topological Monodromy Conjecture for hypersurfaces

Let fC[x1,,xn]f\in\mathbf{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] be a non-constant polynomial with f(0)=0f(0)=0, let μ:YCn\mu:Y\to\mathbf{C}^n be a log resolution of f1(0)f^{-1}(0), and write

Ztop,f(s)=ISχ(EIμ1(0))iI1ais+ki+1Z_{\operatorname{top},f}(s)=\sum_{I\subseteq S}\chi(E_I^{\circ}\cap\mu^{-1}(0))\prod_{i\in I}\frac{1}{a_i s+k_i+1}

for its local topological zeta function. For xf1(0)x\in f^{-1}(0), let Mf,xM_{f,x} be the Milnor fiber of ff at xx, and let bf(s)b_f(s) be the Bernstein–Sato polynomial of ff. Topological Monodromy Conjecture. If cc is a pole of Ztop,f(s)Z_{\operatorname{top},f}(s), then (a) exp(2πic)\exp(2\pi i c) is an eigenvalue of the monodromy action on Hi(Mf,x,C)H^i(M_{f,x},\mathbf{C}) for some ii and some xf1(0)x\in f^{-1}(0), and (b) bf(c)=0b_f(c)=0. The conjecture links poles of the topological zeta function with monodromy and Bernstein–Sato data; the paper proves the monodromy assertion for hyperplane arrangements and reduces the Bernstein–Sato assertion in that setting to the conjecture below.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Nero Budur, Mircea Mustata and Zach Teitler, “The Monodromy Conjecture for hyperplane arrangements”, arXiv:0906.1991 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.