Kashiwara–Vergne conjecture

About 20 years old · traced to

Let k=R{\bf k}={\mathbb R} or C{\mathbb C}, let \G\G be a finite-dimensional k{\bf k}-Lie algebra, and let f^2\hat{\mathfrak f}_{2} denote the completed free Lie algebra on x,yx,y. For A(x,y),B(x,y)∈f^2A(x,y),B(x,y)\in\hat{\mathfrak f}_{2}, define (∂xA)(x,y)∈End⁡(\G)(\partial_xA)(x,y)\in\operatorname{End}(\G) by

(∂xA)(x,y)(a)=ddt∣t=0A(x+ta,y),(\partial_xA)(x,y)(a)=\left.\frac{d}{dt}\right|_{t=0}A(x+ta,y),

and define (∂yB)(x,y)∈End⁡(\G)(\partial_yB)(x,y)\in\operatorname{End}(\G) by

(∂yB)(x,y)(a)=ddt∣t=0B(x,y+ta).(\partial_yB)(x,y)(a)=\left.\frac{d}{dt}\right|_{t=0}B(x,y+ta).

Writing z=log⁡exeyz=\log e^xe^y, the Kashiwara–Vergne conjecture. For every finite-dimensional k{\bf k}-Lie algebra \G\G, there exists a pair of Lie series A(x,y),B(x,y)∈f^2A(x,y),B(x,y)\in\hat{\mathfrak f}_{2} such that

x+y−log⁡eyex=(1−e−ad⁡x)(A(x,y))+(ead⁡y−1)(B(x,y)),x+y-\log e^ye^x=(1-e^{-\operatorname{ad}x})(A(x,y))+(e^{\operatorname{ad}y}-1)(B(x,y)),

AA and BB give convergent power series in a neighborhood of (0,0)∈\G2(0,0)\in\G^2, and

tr⁡\G((ad⁡x)∂xA+(ad⁡y)∂yB)=12tr⁡\G(ad⁡xead⁡x−1+ad⁡yead⁡y−1−ad⁡zead⁡z−1−1),\operatorname{tr}_{\G}\bigl((\operatorname{ad}x)\partial_xA+(\operatorname{ad}y)\partial_yB\bigr)=\frac12\operatorname{tr}_{\G}\left(\frac{\operatorname{ad}x}{e^{\operatorname{ad}x}-1}+\frac{\operatorname{ad}y}{e^{\operatorname{ad}y}-1}-\frac{\operatorname{ad}z}{e^{\operatorname{ad}z}-1}-1\right),

where the last identity is an identity of analytic functions on \G2\G^2 near the origin. This conjecture is the original analytic form of the Kashiwara–Vergne equations, relating the Campbell–Baker–Hausdorff series to trace identities for adjoint operators. The source presents it as a conjecture; its resolution status is not specified in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

A. Alekseev, B. Enriquez and C. Torossian, “Drinfeld associators, braid groups and explicit solutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne equations”, arXiv:0903.4067 (2009).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2006–2009). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0612548.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.