The tensor-product realization conjecture for irregular minimal affinizations

At least 17 years old · documented by

Let \lieg\lie g be of type DD or EE, with the decomposition used in the paper into subdiagrams I1I_1, JJ, and I2I_2, where JJ is of type D4D_4. Let λ∈P+\lambda\in P^+ and let \gbλ∈Pq+\gb\lambda\in\cal P_q^+ be such that Vq(\gbλ)V_q(\gb\lambda) is a minimal affinization of Vq(λ)V_q(\lambda). Let NN be the \lieg[t]\lie g[t]-submodule of

L(λI1)⊗L(\gbλJ)⊗L(λI2)L(\lambda^{I_1})\otimes L(\gb\lambda^J)\otimes L(\lambda^{I_2})

generated by the top weight space. Tensor-product realization conjecture. There is an isomorphism

L(\gbλ)≅N.L(\gb\lambda)\cong N.

A proposition establishes only that L(\gbλ)L(\gb\lambda) projects onto this submodule; the conjecture strengthens the projection to an isomorphism in the irregular case, where the number of minimal-affinization classes is not uniformly bounded.

References

Primary source

Adriano Moura, “Restricted limits of minimal affinizations”, arXiv:0812.2238 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.