The T(λ)T(\lambda)M(λ)M(\lambda)L(\gbλ)L(\gb\lambda) conjecture for minimal affinizations

Let λP+\lambda\in P^+ be such that its extended support supp(λ)\overline{\operatorname{supp}}(\lambda) does not contain a subdiagram of type D4D_4. Let \gbλPA++\gb\lambda\in\cal P_\mathbb A^{++} be such that Vq(\gbλ)V_q(\gb\lambda) is a minimal affinization of Vq(λ)V_q(\lambda). Let M(λ)M(\lambda) and T(λ)T(\lambda) be the \lieg[t]\lie g[t]-modules defined in the paper. T(λ)T(\lambda)M(λ)M(\lambda)L(\gbλ)L(\gb\lambda) conjecture. One has

T(λ)M(λ)L(\gbλ).T(\lambda)\cong M(\lambda)\cong L(\gb\lambda).

This is presented as the expected generalization of an earlier proposition; the source does not state a resolution of it.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Adriano Moura, “Restricted limits of minimal affinizations”, arXiv:0812.2238 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.