The rationality conjecture for the Tamagawa number conjecture

About 18 years old · traced to

Let MM be one of the motives M(F)M(F) or M(η)M(\eta). Let Ξ(M)\Xi(M) be the fundamental line

Ξ(M):=Det⁡E(Hf0(M))⊗EDet⁡E−1(Hf1(M∨(1)))⊗EDet⁡E−1(MB),\Xi(M):=\operatorname{Det}_E(H^0_f(M))\otimes_E\operatorname{Det}_E^{-1}(H^1_f(M^\vee(1)))\otimes_E\operatorname{Det}_E^{-1}(M_B),

and let ϑ∞:E∞≃Ξ(M)⊗QR\vartheta_\infty:E_\infty\simeq\Xi(M)\otimes_\mathbb{Q}\mathbb{R} be the isomorphism induced by the regulator exact sequence. Rational conjecture.

ϑ∞(L∗(M,0)−1)∈Ξ(M)⊗Q1.\vartheta_\infty(L^*(M,0)^{-1})\in\Xi(M)\otimes_\mathbb{Q}1.

This is the rationality part of the Tamagawa number conjecture, asserting that the leading term of the LL-function gives a rational generator of the fundamental line. The source presents it as a conjectural formulation for the motives under consideration.

References

Primary source

Jennifer Johnson-Leung and Guido Kings, “On the equivariant and the non-equivariant main conjecture for imaginary quadratic fields”, arXiv:0804.2828 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.