Yoshida-type lifting conjecture for level 2 and level 4 elliptic forms

Let Sj,k(Γ2[2])S_{j,k}(\Gamma_2[2]) be the space of Siegel cusp forms of weight (j,k)(j,k) on the principal level-22 subgroup, and let w2w_2 act on newforms of level 22. For new eigenforms

fSl+m+4(Γ0(2))new,gSlm+2(Γ0(2))new,f\in S_{l+m+4}(\Gamma_0(2))^{\rm new},\qquad g\in S_{l-m+2}(\Gamma_0(2))^{\rm new},

write L(f,s)L(f,s) and L(g,s)L(g,s) for their LL-functions. Yoshida-type lifting conjecture. There is a Siegel Hecke eigenform FSlm,m+3(Γ2[2])F\in S_{l-m,m+3}(\Gamma_2[2]) with

L(F,s)=L(f,s)L(g,sm1).L(F,s)=L(f,s)L(g,s-m-1).

It occurs with multiplicity 55 when ff and gg have the same w2w_2-eigenvalue and with multiplicity 11 when their eigenvalues are opposite. Likewise, for new eigenforms at level 44,

fSl+m+4(Γ0(4))new,gSlm+2(Γ0(4))new,f\in S_{l+m+4}(\Gamma_0(4))^{\rm new},\qquad g\in S_{l-m+2}(\Gamma_0(4))^{\rm new},

there is such an FF with the same spinor LL-function, occurring with multiplicity 55. This proposes a level-22 analogue of Yoshida lifting and explains predicted endoscopic pieces of the cohomology.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jonas Bergström, Carel Faber and Gerard van der Geer, “Siegel modular forms of genus 2 and level 2: cohomological computations and conjectures”, arXiv:0803.0917 (2008).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.