Ihara's lemma conjecture for Shimura-curve cohomology

Let qq be a prime such that qNΔ2q\nmid N\Delta'\ell^2. Let T0ψ^(N){\bf T}_0^{\widehat\psi}(N) act on H1(X1(N),O)ψ^H^1({\bf X}_1(N),\mathcal O)^{\widehat\psi}, and fix a maximal non-Eisenstein ideal m\mathfrak m. Define the Shimura curve

X1(N)=B×BA×/K+V1(N),{\bf X}_1(N)=B^\times\setminus B_{\bf A}^\times/K_\infty^+V_1(N),

where

V1(N)=pNRp×pNKp1(N)×(1+uR).V_1(N)=\prod_{p\nmid N\ell}R_p^\times\prod_{p\mid N}K_p^1(N)\times(1+u_\ell R_\ell).

Let mq\mathfrak m^q be the inverse image of m\mathfrak m under T0ψ^(Nq)T0ψ^(N){\bf T}_0^{\widehat\psi}(Nq)\to{\bf T}_0^{\widehat\psi}(N), and let k=O/λk=\mathcal O/\lambda. Ihara's lemma conjecture. The map

αm:H1(X1(N),O)mψ^×H1(X1(N),O)mψ^H1(X1(Nq),O)mqψ^\alpha_{\mathfrak m}:H^1({\bf X}_1(N),\mathcal O)_{\mathfrak m}^{\widehat\psi}\times H^1({\bf X}_1(N),\mathcal O)_{\mathfrak m}^{\widehat\psi}\longrightarrow H^1({\bf X}_1(Nq),\mathcal O)_{\mathfrak m^q}^{\widehat\psi}

is such that αmOk\alpha_{\mathfrak m}\otimes_{\mathcal O}k is injective. This is the quaternionic analogue of Ihara's lemma needed to extend the preceding minimal-level results to higher level; the paper explicitly presents the assertion as a conjectural input from which the preceding conjecture would follow, so its resolution is not supplied here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Miriam Ciavarella, “Congruences between modular forms and related modules”, arXiv:0710.4677 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.