Cappell–Miller conjecture on torsion and Reidemeister torsion

At least 18 years old · documented by

Let (E,∇)(E,\nabla) be a flat vector bundle over a closed oriented odd-dimensional manifold MM. Let T∇T_\nabla denote its Cappell–Miller torsion, let E∗E^* be the dual bundle with dual connection ∇∗\nabla^*, let D:Det⁡(H∙(M,E))→Det⁡(H∙(M,E∗))D:\operatorname{Det}(H^\bullet(M,E))\to\operatorname{Det}(H^\bullet(M,E^*)) be the Farber–Turaev duality operator, and let ρR⁡(∇⊕∇∗)\rho^{\operatorname{R}}(\nabla\oplus\nabla^*) be the Reidemeister torsion of E⊕E∗E\oplus E^*. Let z∈Nz\in\mathbb{N} be the integer defined in formula (6.5) of Farber–Turaev.

Cappell–Miller conjecture. The Cappell–Miller torsion satisfies

(1⊗D)T∇=(−1)zρR⁡(∇⊕∇∗).(1\otimes D)T_\nabla=(-1)^z\rho^{\operatorname{R}}(\nabla\oplus\nabla^*).

The statement relates the analytic Cappell–Miller torsion to the Reidemeister torsion of the self-dual bundle E⊕E∗E\oplus E^*. The source presents it as equivalent to a reformulation of the Burghelea–Haller conjecture; its resolution is not specified in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Maxim Braverman and Thomas Kappeler, “A Canonical Quadratic Form on the Determinant Line of a Flat Vector Bundle”, arXiv:0710.1232 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.