Kato's conjecture

About 73 years old · traced to

Let n≥1n\ge 1 and let A:Rn→Mn(C)A:\mathbb{R}^n\to M_n(\mathbb{C}) be a measurable matrix-valued function for which there exist constants λ>0\lambda>0 and Λ<∞\Lambda<\infty such that, for almost every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^n and all ξ,η∈Cn\xi,\eta\in\mathbb{C}^n,

Re⁡⟨A(x)ξ,ξ⟩ ≥ λ∣ξ∣2,∣⟨A(x)ξ,η⟩∣ ≤ Λ ∣ξ∣ ∣η∣.\operatorname{Re}\big\langle A(x)\xi,\xi\big\rangle\ \ge\ \lambda|\xi|^2,\qquad \big|\big\langle A(x)\xi,\eta\big\rangle\big|\ \le\ \Lambda\,|\xi|\,|\eta| .

Let L=−div⁡(A∇)L=-\operatorname{div}(A\nabla) be the operator in L2(Rn)L^2(\mathbb{R}^n) associated with the sesquilinear form

J(f,g)=∫Rn⟨A(x)∇f(x),∇g(x)⟩ dx,f,g∈H1(Rn),J(f,g)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\big\langle A(x)\nabla f(x),\nabla g(x)\big\rangle\,dx,\qquad f,g\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^n),

that is, f∈D(L)f\in\mathcal{D}(L) with Lf=uLf=u if and only if f∈H1(Rn)f\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^n), u∈L2(Rn)u\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n) and J(f,g)=⟨u,g⟩J(f,g)=\langle u,g\rangle for all g∈H1(Rn)g\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^n). Then LL is maximal accretive, so its accretive square root L=L1/2\sqrt{L}=L^{1/2} is defined by the holomorphic functional calculus for LL, and

D(L)=H1(Rn),\mathcal{D}\big(\sqrt{L}\big)=H^1(\mathbb{R}^n),

with constants 0<c≤C<∞0<c\le C<\infty depending only on n,λ,Λn,\lambda,\Lambda such that

c ∥∇f∥2 ≤ ∥L f∥2 ≤ C ∥∇f∥2for all f∈H1(Rn).c\,\|\nabla f\|_{2}\ \le\ \big\|\sqrt{L}\,f\big\|_{2}\ \le\ C\,\|\nabla f\|_{2}\qquad\text{for all } f\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^n).
References

Primary source

Wikipedia

Additional references

  1. Wikipedia, Kato's conjecture, the article this problem comes from.

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

The conjecture was proved affirmatively more than two decades ago, and a recent similarly named counterexample concerns a different problem.

Tosio Kato posed the conjecture in 1953 for uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators. It asserts that the square-root domain equals H1(Rn)H^1(\mathbb{R}^n) with equivalent gradient and square-root norms; this stated problem is solved.

Known results

  • Hofmann, Lacey, and McIntosh, 2002: proved the result under Gaussian heat-kernel bounds.
  • Auscher, Hofmann, Lacey, McIntosh, and Tchamitchian, 2001/2002: proved it in full generality for bounded measurable complex coefficients.
  • Auscher, Axelsson, and McIntosh, 2010: gave a self-contained quadratic-estimate framework and extensions to higher-order elliptic systems.

August 2026 naming collision

An August 2026 preprint by Frank and Ivanisvili is described as a counterexample to a different conjecture also called Kato’s, involving positivity of operator commutators and predicted strip widths. It does not challenge the divergence-form square-root theorem; the associated posts credit AI generally, without naming a model.

Current status (as of August 2026): The stated Kato square-root conjecture is resolved in full generality; no part of this formulation remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.