Novikov conjecture
Let be a discrete group and let be a classifying space for , that is, a CW complex of type . Let be a closed, connected, oriented smooth manifold of dimension , with fundamental class and total Hirzebruch -class
For a continuous map and a class , the higher signature is
For this is the ordinary signature of , by the Hirzebruch signature theorem.
Conjecture. For every discrete group and every the higher signature is an oriented homotopy invariant. That is, if is another closed oriented smooth manifold and is an orientation-preserving homotopy equivalence, then
It suffices to prove this for finitely presented , since one may replace by . For a given group the conjecture is equivalent to rational injectivity of the -theory assembly map
The problem is to prove the conjecture for all groups, or to exhibit a group , a class and a homotopy equivalence for which it fails. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Background
Novikov proved in 1965 that the rational Pontryagin classes of a manifold are topological invariants. The individual classes are not homotopy invariants, and the signature theorem shows that only the top-degree combination is [2]. Novikov stated the conjecture around 1970, after proving it for [1, 2]. It identifies which characteristic numbers built from Pontryagin classes and the fundamental group are homotopy invariant.
The conjecture became a central link between surgery theory and noncommutative geometry. In surgery theory it is rational injectivity of the assembly map above. In operator algebras it follows from rational injectivity of the Baum–Connes assembly map , the strong Novikov conjecture. Methods from coarse geometry, -theory of group -algebras and controlled topology have all been brought to bear [2, 3, 4].
References
- S. P. Novikov, "Algebraic construction and properties of Hermitian analogs of K-theory over rings with involution from the viewpoint of Hamiltonian formalism. Applications to differential topology and the theory of characteristic classes. I, II", Math. USSR-Izv. 4 (1970), 257–292 and 479–505. doi:10.1070/IM1970v004n02ABEH000903
- S. C. Ferry, A. Ranicki and J. Rosenberg, "A history and survey of the Novikov conjecture", in Novikov Conjectures, Index Theorems and Rigidity, Vol. 1, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 226, Cambridge Univ. Press (1995), 7–66. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662676.003
- W. Lück and H. Reich, "The Baum–Connes and the Farrell–Jones conjectures in K- and L-theory", in Handbook of K-Theory, Springer (2005), 703–842. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27855-9_15
- M. Kreck and W. Lück, The Novikov Conjecture: Geometry and Algebra, Oberwolfach Seminars 33, Birkhäuser (2005). doi:10.1007/b137100
- G. Lusztig, "Novikov's higher signature and families of elliptic operators", J. Differential Geom. 7 (1972), 229–256. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214430829
- G. G. Kasparov, "Equivariant KK-theory and the Novikov conjecture", Invent. Math. 91 (1988), 147–201. doi:10.1007/BF01404917
- A. Connes and H. Moscovici, "Cyclic cohomology, the Novikov conjecture and hyperbolic groups", Topology 29 (1990), 345–388. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(90)90003-3
- N. Higson and G. Kasparov, "E-theory and KK-theory for groups which act properly and isometrically on Hilbert space", Invent. Math. 144 (2001), 23–74. doi:10.1007/s002220000118
- G. Yu, "The coarse Baum–Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a uniform embedding into Hilbert space", Invent. Math. 139 (2000), 201–240. doi:10.1007/s002229900032
- E. Guentner, N. Higson and S. Weinberger, "The Novikov conjecture for linear groups", Publ. Math. IHÉS 101 (2005), 243–268. doi:10.1007/s10240-005-0030-5
- U. Hamenstädt, "Geometry of the mapping class groups I: Boundary amenability", Invent. Math. 175 (2009), 545–609. doi:10.1007/s00222-008-0158-2
- N. Higson, V. Lafforgue and G. Skandalis, "Counterexamples to the Baum–Connes conjecture", Geom. Funct. Anal. 12 (2002), 330–354. doi:10.1007/s00039-002-8249-5
- Wikipedia, Novikov conjecture.
Source: Wikipedia
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.