Dickson's conjecture
Let and let and be integers with for every , and consider the linear forms
Suppose that no prime divides all the values of the product, that is, suppose that for every prime there exists an integer with
Then there are infinitely many positive integers such that the numbers are all prime.
Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Dickson's prime -tuples conjecture
Let , and let be integers with for . Suppose that for every prime there exists an integer such that
Dickson's prime -tuples conjecture. There exist infinitely many integers such that is prime for . This conjecture, denoted in the paper, is attributed to Dickson (1904) and generalizes the assertion that admissible linear forms simultaneously take prime values; it remains open except in limited cases.
source: Pieter Moree, “Primitive root producing quadratics”, arXiv:math/0406033 (2004).
References
Primary source
Additional references
- Wikipedia, Dickson's conjecture, the article this problem comes from.
Progress summary
Dickson’s conjecture remains unproved, with a new unrefereed manuscript offering computational certificates but no verified resolution.
Leonard Dickson proposed the conjecture in 1904: any finite admissible family of linear forms should be simultaneously prime infinitely often. The case is Dirichlet’s theorem, while twin primes and other prime-pattern conjectures are special cases.
Known results
- Dirichlet’s theorem proves the one-form case .
- Zhang (2013) proved a weaker statement for sufficiently large , yielding bounded prime gaps.
- Maynard–Tao proved that sufficiently large admissible families contain infinitely many inputs where at least forms are prime, for every ; this does not give simultaneous primality of all forms.
September 3, 2026 certificate manuscript
On September 3, 2026, Ivan Anisenya’s Zenodo manuscript proposed explicit computational certificates and a framework relating Dickson’s conjecture to prime-constellation counts. It does not establish the conjecture; the deposit is unrefereed and its certificates remain unverified.
Current status (as of September 2026): Dickson’s conjecture remains open; classical partial results and the new certificate claims do not prove simultaneous primality of every admissible family.
Sources
- en.wikipedia.org
- oeis.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- cs.nyu.edu
- doi.org
- t5k.org
- researchgate.net
- scientificamerican.com
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- x.com
- x.com
- x.com
- x.com
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.