← All problems

Grothendieck's standard conjectures

61 years old · traced to

Let kk be a field and let H∗H^* be a Weil cohomology theory for smooth projective kk-varieties with coefficients in a field FF of characteristic 00. Examples include ℓ\ell-adic cohomology of XkˉX_{\bar k} for a prime ℓ≠char⁡k\ell\neq\operatorname{char}k, and Betti or algebraic de Rham cohomology when char⁡k=0\operatorname{char}k=0. Let XX be a smooth projective variety of dimension nn over kk.

  • Zi(X)\mathcal Z^i(X) is the Q\mathbb Q-vector space of algebraic cycles of codimension ii on XX.
  • γX ⁣:Zi(X)→H2i(X)\gamma_X\colon\mathcal Z^i(X)\to H^{2i}(X) is the cycle class map, with Tate twists suppressed.
  • Ai(X)⊆H2i(X)A^i(X)\subseteq H^{2i}(X) is the Q\mathbb Q-span of γX(Zi(X))\gamma_X(\mathcal Z^i(X)).

A linear map ϕ ⁣:H∗(X)→H∗(X)\phi\colon H^*(X)\to H^*(X) is algebraic if some cycle Γ∈Z∗(X×X)\Gamma\in\mathcal Z^*(X\times X) induces it:

ϕ(x)=p2∗(γX×X(Γ)∪p1∗x).\phi(x)=p_{2*}\bigl(\gamma_{X\times X}(\Gamma)\cup p_1^*x\bigr).

Fix a smooth hyperplane section WW and let L(x)=γX(W)∪xL(x)=\gamma_X(W)\cup x. By hard Lefschetz, Ln−m ⁣:Hm(X)→H2n−m(X)L^{n-m}\colon H^m(X)\to H^{2n-m}(X) is an isomorphism for m≤nm\le n. This gives the Lefschetz decomposition

Hm(X)=⨁j≥0LjPm−2j(X),Pm(X)=ker⁡(Ln−m+1 ⁣:Hm(X)→H2n−m+2(X))(m≤n).H^m(X)=\bigoplus_{j\ge 0}L^j P^{m-2j}(X),\qquad P^m(X)=\ker\bigl(L^{n-m+1}\colon H^m(X)\to H^{2n-m+2}(X)\bigr)\quad(m\le n).

The Lefschetz operator Λ\Lambda is defined by Λ(Lja)=Lj−1a\Lambda(L^ja)=L^{j-1}a for a∈Pm(X)a\in P^m(X) and j≥1j\ge1, and Λ(a)=0\Lambda(a)=0 for primitive aa.

The standard conjectures assert that the following hold for every kk, H∗H^*, and XX as above:

  • B(X)B(X), Lefschetz type. Λ\Lambda is algebraic.
  • C(X)C(X), Künneth type. For each 0≤m≤2n0\le m\le 2n, the projector πm ⁣:H∗(X)→Hm(X)⊆H∗(X)\pi^m\colon H^*(X)\to H^m(X)\subseteq H^*(X) is algebraic. Equivalently, each Künneth component of the diagonal class γX×X(ΔX)\gamma_{X\times X}(\Delta_X) is algebraic.
  • D(X)D(X), homological equals numerical. For every ii and every z∈Zi(X)z\in\mathcal Z^i(X), γX(z)=0\gamma_X(z)=0 if and only if deg⁡(z⋅z′)=0\deg(z\cdot z')=0 for every z′∈Zn−i(X)z'\in\mathcal Z^{n-i}(X).
  • Hdg(X)\mathrm{Hdg}(X), Hodge type. For every ii with 2i≤n2i\le n, the Q\mathbb Q-valued form
⟨x,y⟩=(−1)i tr⁡X(Ln−2i(x∪y))\langle x,y\rangle=(-1)^i\,\operatorname{tr}_X\bigl(L^{n-2i}(x\cup y)\bigr)

is positive definite on Aprimi(X)=Ai(X)∩P2i(X)A^i_{\mathrm{prim}}(X)=A^i(X)\cap P^{2i}(X).

In characteristic 00, Hodge theory proves Hdg(X)\mathrm{Hdg}(X). The open problem is the full set of assertions for all varieties over all fields. BB, CC and DD are open in characteristic 00, and all four are open in positive characteristic. [1, 2, 3]

Background

Grothendieck stated these conjectures in the mid-1960s and published them in 1969 [1]. They had two aims. The first was the Weil conjectures: BB and Hdg\mathrm{Hdg} together imply the Riemann hypothesis for varieties over finite fields, by an argument modeled on Serre's Kähler analogue. The second was a theory of pure motives. Under DD, motives for homological equivalence coincide with numerical motives. With CC, the category becomes a semisimple, graded Tannakian category whose motivic Galois group is a reductive group. Kleiman's 1968 exposition [2] fixed the now-standard formulation, and his 1994 survey [3] updates it.

The conjectures are tightly linked. B(X)B(X) implies C(X)C(X), and BB together with Hdg\mathrm{Hdg} implies DD. Over C\mathbb C, Λ\Lambda is induced by a Hodge class on X×XX\times X, so the Hodge conjecture implies BB. Deligne proved the Weil conjectures in 1974 by other means, so the standard conjectures are now motivated chiefly by the theory of motives and algebraic cycles.

Equivalent formulations
  1. Let YY be a smooth projective variety of dimension dYd_Y over a field kk, let H∗H^* be a Weil cohomology, and let Halg⁡2j(Y)⊂H2j(Y)H^{2j}_{\operatorname{alg}}(Y) \subset H^{2j}(Y) denote the image of the cycle class map CHj(Y)→H2j(Y)CH^j(Y) \to H^{2j}(Y). For an ample divisor h∈Pic⁡(Y)h \in \operatorname{Pic}(Y), write

    Lhj:=⋅hj:Hj(Y)→H2dY−j(Y).L_h^j:=\cdot h^j:H^j(Y)\to H^{2d_Y-j}(Y).

    Let δj\delta_j denote the Künneth components of the diagonal in

    ΔY∈H2dY(Y×Y)≅⨁j=02dYHj(Y)⊗H2dY−j(Y).\Delta_Y\in H^{2d_Y}(Y\times Y)\cong\bigoplus_{j=0}^{2d_Y}H^j(Y)\otimes H^{2d_Y-j}(Y).

    Grothendieck's standard conjectures. The following assertions hold: (1) there exist correspondences Λj∈CHj(Y×Y)\Lambda_j\in CH^j(Y\times Y) such that Λj∗:H2dY−j(Y)→Hj(Y)\Lambda_{j*}:H^{2d_Y-j}(Y)\to H^j(Y) is the inverse of LhjL_h^j; (2) every Künneth component δj\delta_j is induced by an algebraic cycle, equivalently δj∈Halg⁡2dY(Y×Y)\delta_j\in H^{2d_Y}_{\operatorname{alg}}(Y\times Y); and (3), for every γ∈Halg⁡2j(Y)\gamma\in H^{2j}_{\operatorname{alg}}(Y), if γ⋅γ′=0\gamma\cdot\gamma'=0 for all γ′∈Halg⁡2(dY−j)(Y)\gamma'\in H^{2(d_Y-j)}_{\operatorname{alg}}(Y), then γ=0\gamma=0.

    These are Grothendieck's standard conjectures: the Lefschetz standard conjecture, the Künneth standard conjecture, and the assertion that numerical and homological equivalence coincide on algebraic cohomology classes. The paper's abstract states that it proves them for the Fano variety of lines on a smooth cubic hypersurface, but the supplied text does not specify which of the assertions is being proved or provide a resolution status for the general formulation.

    source: Humberto A. Diaz, “The standard conjectures for the variety of lines on a cubic hypersurface”, arXiv:1706.06683 (2017).

References
  1. A. Grothendieck, "Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles", in Algebraic Geometry (Internat. Colloq., Tata Inst. Fund. Res., Bombay, 1968), Oxford Univ. Press (1969), 193–199.
  2. S. L. Kleiman, "Algebraic cycles and the Weil conjectures", in Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas, North-Holland (1968), 359–386.
  3. S. L. Kleiman, "The standard conjectures", in Motives (Seattle, 1991), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 55, Part 1, AMS (1994), 3–20.
  4. D. I. Lieberman, "Numerical and homological equivalence of algebraic cycles on Hodge manifolds", Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 366–374. doi:10.2307/2373533
  5. F. Charles and E. Markman, "The standard conjectures for holomorphic symplectic varieties deformation equivalent to Hilbert schemes of K3 surfaces", Compos. Math. 149 (2013), 481–494. arXiv:1009.0413
  6. N. M. Katz and W. Messing, "Some consequences of the Riemann hypothesis for varieties over finite fields", Invent. Math. 23 (1974), 73–77. doi:10.1007/BF01405203
  7. G. Ancona, "Standard conjectures for abelian fourfolds", Invent. Math. 223 (2021), 149–212. arXiv:1806.03216
  8. U. Jannsen, "Motives, numerical equivalence, and semi-simplicity", Invent. Math. 107 (1992), 447–452. doi:10.1007/BF01231898
  9. Y. André, "Pour une théorie inconditionnelle des motifs", Publ. Math. IHÉS 83 (1996), 5–49.
  10. J. S. Milne, "Polarizations and Grothendieck's standard conjectures", Ann. of Math. 155 (2002), 599–610. arXiv:math/0103175
  11. Wikipedia, Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles.

Source: Wikipedia

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.