Farrell–Jones conjecture in algebraic K- and L-theory
Let be a discrete group and let be an associative ring with unit. Write for the group ring.
- is the family of virtually cyclic subgroups of , those that are finite or contain as a subgroup of finite index.
- is a classifying space for this family. It is a -CW complex such that the fixed set is contractible for every and empty for every other subgroup . It exists and is unique up to -homotopy equivalence.
- is the -equivariant homology theory of Davis and Lück built from non-connective algebraic -theory [3]. On orbits it takes the values for all .
- If carries an involution, is the analogous theory built from algebraic -theory with decoration . On orbits it takes the values .
The projection induces the assembly maps
Conjecture.
- -theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture. For every group , every ring and every , the map is an isomorphism.
- -theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture. For every group , every ring with involution and every , the map is an isomorphism.
The problem is to prove both statements for all groups, or to give a group, a ring and a degree for which one of them fails. The family cannot be shrunk to the finite subgroups in general: already for and a non-regular ring , the -theory of contains Nil-terms that the finite subgroups do not see. [1, 2, 4]
If is torsion-free and is regular, the -theoretic conjecture reduces to the statement that the classical assembly map is an isomorphism. If is torsion-free, the -theoretic conjecture reduces in the same way to . [2]
Background
Farrell and Jones formulated the conjecture in 1993 [1]. It grew out of their work on topological rigidity of nonpositively curved manifolds, which used controlled topology and the geodesic flow. The conjecture predicts that the - and -theory of a group ring are assembled from the virtually cyclic subgroups together with homological data. It is the algebraic counterpart of the Baum–Connes conjecture for group -algebras [2].
The conjecture implies many other problems. For a torsion-free group , the -theoretic version for gives , and for . Together with the -theoretic version it implies the Borel conjecture for closed aspherical manifolds of dimension at least : any homotopy equivalence between two such manifolds is homotopic to a homeomorphism. The -theoretic version implies the Novikov conjecture. Further consequences include the Kaplansky idempotent conjecture and the Bass conjecture for wide classes of rings [2, 4]. In practice one proves a stronger version with coefficients in additive categories [5], because that version passes to subgroups, finite products and directed colimits.
Equivalent formulations
In mathematics, the Farrell–Jones conjecture, named after F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, states that certain assembly maps are isomorphisms. These maps are given as certain homomorphisms.
source: Wikipedia
References
- F. T. Farrell and L. E. Jones, "Isomorphism conjectures in algebraic K-theory", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1993), 249–297. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-1993-1179537-0
- W. Lück and H. Reich, "The Baum–Connes and the Farrell–Jones conjectures in K- and L-theory", in Handbook of K-Theory, Springer (2005), 703–842. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27855-9_15
- J. F. Davis and W. Lück, "Spaces over a category and assembly maps in isomorphism conjectures in K- and L-theory", K-Theory 15 (1998), 201–252. doi:10.1023/A:1007784106877
- W. Lück, Isomorphism Conjectures in K- and L-Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), Springer (2025). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98976-6
- A. Bartels and H. Reich, "Coefficients for the Farrell–Jones conjecture", Adv. Math. 209 (2007), 337–362. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.005
- A. Bartels, W. Lück and H. Reich, "The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for hyperbolic groups", Invent. Math. 172 (2008), 29–70. doi:10.1007/s00222-007-0093-7
- A. Bartels and W. Lück, "The Borel conjecture for hyperbolic and CAT(0)-groups", Ann. of Math. 175 (2012), 631–689. doi:10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.5
- C. Wegner, "The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for CAT(0)-groups", Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 779–793. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-11150-X
- A. Bartels, F. T. Farrell and W. Lück, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for cocompact lattices in virtually connected Lie groups", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 27 (2014), 339–388. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00782-7
- H. Kammeyer, W. Lück and H. Rüping, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for arbitrary lattices in virtually connected Lie groups", Geom. Topol. 20 (2016), 1275–1287. doi:10.2140/gt.2016.20.1275
- C. Wegner, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for virtually solvable groups", J. Topol. 8 (2015), 975–1016. doi:10.1112/jtopol/jtv026
- A. Bartels and M. Bestvina, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for mapping class groups", Invent. Math. 215 (2019), 651–712. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0834-9
- W. Lück, "Survey on the Farrell–Jones conjecture", preprint (2025). arXiv:2507.11337
- Wikipedia, Farrell–Jones conjecture.
Source: Wikipedia
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.