← All problems

Farrell–Jones conjecture in algebraic K- and L-theory

33 years old · traced to

Let GG be a discrete group and let RR be an associative ring with unit. Write RGRG for the group ring.

  • VCyc\mathcal{VCyc} is the family of virtually cyclic subgroups of GG, those that are finite or contain Z\mathbb Z as a subgroup of finite index.
  • EVCycGE_{\mathcal{VCyc}}G is a classifying space for this family. It is a GG-CW complex such that the fixed set (EVCycG)H(E_{\mathcal{VCyc}}G)^H is contractible for every H∈VCycH\in\mathcal{VCyc} and empty for every other subgroup HH. It exists and is unique up to GG-homotopy equivalence.
  • H∗G(−;KR)H^G_*(-;\mathbf K_R) is the GG-equivariant homology theory of Davis and Lück built from non-connective algebraic KK-theory [3]. On orbits it takes the values HnG(G/H;KR)=Kn(RH)H^G_n(G/H;\mathbf K_R)=K_n(RH) for all n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z.
  • If RR carries an involution, H∗G(−;LR⟨−∞⟩)H^G_*(-;\mathbf L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}_R) is the analogous theory built from algebraic LL-theory with decoration ⟨−∞⟩\langle-\infty\rangle. On orbits it takes the values Ln⟨−∞⟩(RH)L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}_n(RH).

The projection EVCycG→G/G=ptE_{\mathcal{VCyc}}G\to G/G=\mathrm{pt} induces the assembly maps

asmbnK ⁣:HnG(EVCycG;KR)⟶Kn(RG),asmbnL ⁣:HnG(EVCycG;LR⟨−∞⟩)⟶Ln⟨−∞⟩(RG).\mathrm{asmb}^K_n\colon H^G_n(E_{\mathcal{VCyc}}G;\mathbf K_R)\longrightarrow K_n(RG), \qquad \mathrm{asmb}^L_n\colon H^G_n(E_{\mathcal{VCyc}}G;\mathbf L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}_R)\longrightarrow L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}_n(RG).

Conjecture.

  • KK-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture. For every group GG, every ring RR and every n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z, the map asmbnK\mathrm{asmb}^K_n is an isomorphism.
  • LL-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture. For every group GG, every ring with involution RR and every n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z, the map asmbnL\mathrm{asmb}^L_n is an isomorphism.

The problem is to prove both statements for all groups, or to give a group, a ring and a degree for which one of them fails. The family VCyc\mathcal{VCyc} cannot be shrunk to the finite subgroups in general: already for G=ZG=\mathbb Z and a non-regular ring RR, the KK-theory of R[Z]R[\mathbb Z] contains Nil-terms that the finite subgroups do not see. [1, 2, 4]

If GG is torsion-free and RR is regular, the KK-theoretic conjecture reduces to the statement that the classical assembly map Hn(BG;K(R))→Kn(RG)H_n(BG;\mathbf K(R))\to K_n(RG) is an isomorphism. If GG is torsion-free, the LL-theoretic conjecture reduces in the same way to Hn(BG;L⟨−∞⟩(R))→Ln⟨−∞⟩(RG)H_n(BG;\mathbf L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}(R))\to L^{\langle-\infty\rangle}_n(RG). [2]

Background

Farrell and Jones formulated the conjecture in 1993 [1]. It grew out of their work on topological rigidity of nonpositively curved manifolds, which used controlled topology and the geodesic flow. The conjecture predicts that the KK- and LL-theory of a group ring are assembled from the virtually cyclic subgroups together with homological data. It is the algebraic counterpart of the Baum–Connes conjecture for group C∗C^*-algebras [2].

The conjecture implies many other problems. For a torsion-free group GG, the KK-theoretic version for R=ZR=\mathbb Z gives Wh(G)=0\mathrm{Wh}(G)=0, K~0(ZG)=0\widetilde K_0(\mathbb ZG)=0 and K−i(ZG)=0K_{-i}(\mathbb ZG)=0 for i≥1i\ge1. Together with the LL-theoretic version it implies the Borel conjecture for closed aspherical manifolds of dimension at least 55: any homotopy equivalence between two such manifolds is homotopic to a homeomorphism. The LL-theoretic version implies the Novikov conjecture. Further consequences include the Kaplansky idempotent conjecture and the Bass conjecture for wide classes of rings [2, 4]. In practice one proves a stronger version with coefficients in additive categories [5], because that version passes to subgroups, finite products and directed colimits.

Equivalent formulations
  1. In mathematics, the Farrell–Jones conjecture, named after F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, states that certain assembly maps are isomorphisms. These maps are given as certain homomorphisms.

    source: Wikipedia

References
  1. F. T. Farrell and L. E. Jones, "Isomorphism conjectures in algebraic K-theory", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1993), 249–297. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-1993-1179537-0
  2. W. Lück and H. Reich, "The Baum–Connes and the Farrell–Jones conjectures in K- and L-theory", in Handbook of K-Theory, Springer (2005), 703–842. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27855-9_15
  3. J. F. Davis and W. Lück, "Spaces over a category and assembly maps in isomorphism conjectures in K- and L-theory", K-Theory 15 (1998), 201–252. doi:10.1023/A:1007784106877
  4. W. Lück, Isomorphism Conjectures in K- and L-Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), Springer (2025). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98976-6
  5. A. Bartels and H. Reich, "Coefficients for the Farrell–Jones conjecture", Adv. Math. 209 (2007), 337–362. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.005
  6. A. Bartels, W. Lück and H. Reich, "The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for hyperbolic groups", Invent. Math. 172 (2008), 29–70. doi:10.1007/s00222-007-0093-7
  7. A. Bartels and W. Lück, "The Borel conjecture for hyperbolic and CAT(0)-groups", Ann. of Math. 175 (2012), 631–689. doi:10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.5
  8. C. Wegner, "The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for CAT(0)-groups", Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 779–793. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-11150-X
  9. A. Bartels, F. T. Farrell and W. Lück, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for cocompact lattices in virtually connected Lie groups", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 27 (2014), 339–388. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00782-7
  10. H. Kammeyer, W. Lück and H. Rüping, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for arbitrary lattices in virtually connected Lie groups", Geom. Topol. 20 (2016), 1275–1287. doi:10.2140/gt.2016.20.1275
  11. C. Wegner, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for virtually solvable groups", J. Topol. 8 (2015), 975–1016. doi:10.1112/jtopol/jtv026
  12. A. Bartels and M. Bestvina, "The Farrell–Jones conjecture for mapping class groups", Invent. Math. 215 (2019), 651–712. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0834-9
  13. W. Lück, "Survey on the Farrell–Jones conjecture", preprint (2025). arXiv:2507.11337
  14. Wikipedia, Farrell–Jones conjecture.

Source: Wikipedia

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.