Erdős Problem #1138 — Primes in Intervals Determined by the Maximal Prime Gap

About 27 years old · traced to

For x∈Rx\in\mathbb R, define

d(x)=sup⁡{pn+1−pn:n∈range⁡(π′(⌈x⌉+))},d(x)=\sup\{p_{n+1}-p_n:n\in\operatorname{range}(\pi'(\lceil x\rceil_+))\},

where pnp_n is the nnth prime, π′\pi' is the natural-number prime-counting function, and the supremum is taken in N\mathbb N (equivalently, this is the supremum of primeGap over that finite range). For C>1C>1, define

NC(x,y)=π ⁣(⌊y+Cd(x)⌋+)−π ⁣(⌊y⌋+).N_C(x,y)=\pi\!\left(\left\lfloor y+C d(x)\right\rfloor_+\right)-\pi\!\left(\left\lfloor y\right\rfloor_+\right).

As (x,y)∈R2(x,y)\in\mathbb R^2 tends to infinity with x/2<y<xx/2<y<x, is it true that

NC(x,y)∼Cd(x)log⁡y?N_C(x,y)\sim \frac{C d(x)}{\log y}?

Here the limit is taken with x→∞x\to\infty subject to x/2<y<xx/2<y<x.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reported April 2026 disproof challenges the prime-counting conjecture, but it has not been independently verified and a related stronger version remains open.

The conjecture asks whether the stated prime-counting asymptotic holds for every fixed C>1C>1. It is catalogued as an Erdős problem, with no posing date recorded in the available sources.

April 2026 claimed disproof

Kireet Cheri, Sourish Kumrawat, and Hrishi Sunder claim a contradiction based on a record prime gap d=pn+1−pnd=p_{n+1}-p_n, taking x=pn+1x=p_n+1 and y=pn−2dy=p_n-2d. Comparing C=2C=2 with fixed C<3C<3 allegedly refutes the assertion; the claim and its incomplete Lean formalization remain unverified. A slowly growing C=C(x)C=C(x) variant remains open.

Community submission (unverified), September 5, 2026

A submitted argument gives lower bounds for certain union-closed families whose three-element smallest member has only rare elements, including M≥19M\ge19 in one case. It explicitly does not resolve Frankl’s conjecture and is unrelated to Erdős problem 11381138; its claimed Lean checks are unverified here.

Current status (as of September 2026): the original assertion for every fixed C>1C>1 has a claimed disproof, but it remains unverified; the slowly growing-CC variant remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.