Erdős Problem #858 — Let A⊆{1,…,N}A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\} be such that there is no solution to at=bat=b with a,b∈Aa,b\in A and the smallest prime factor of tt is >a>a.

About 56 years old · traced to

Let A⊆{1,…,N}A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\} be such that there is no solution to at=bat=b with a,b∈Aa,b\in A and the smallest prime factor of tt is >a>a. Estimate the maximum of 1log⁡N∑n∈A1n.\frac{1}{\log N}\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A paper claims an exact asymptotic answer, but the finite problem has not been independently verified as solved.

Erdős posed this weighted finite extremal problem in 1970: estimate the largest value of the normalized reciprocal sum over admissible subsets of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\}.

Known results

  • Alexander (1966) proved that admissible infinite sets have reciprocal sums o(log⁡N)o(\log N).
  • Erdős, Sárközi, and Szemerédi (1968) proved the same normalized upper bound for the corresponding infinite-set formulation.
  • A 2022 study of LL-primitive sets gives an exact supremum for ∑a∈A1/(alog⁡a)\sum_{a\in A}1/(a\log a) and proves a tail bound with limit eγe^\gamma, but does not state the finite-NN maximum in precisely the problem’s normalization.

Undated claimed resolution; related 2022 paper

An online paper claims a sharp finite frontier theorem and M(N)=(c2+o(1))log⁡NM(N)=(c_2+o(1))\log N, with c2=0.6187712111099834…c_2=0.6187712111099834\ldots and cutoff exponent α2=0.2804383098923534…\alpha_2=0.2804383098923534\ldots. The problem entry attributes this claim to Chojecki and GPT-5.4 Pro, but the result remains unverified; no retrieved source reports a subsequent correction or independent confirmation.

Current status (as of September 2026): The classical o(log⁡N)o(\log N) bound is known, while the claimed sharp finite-NN asymptotic remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.