Erdős Problem #333 — Thin Additive Bases for Density-Zero Sets

At least 45 years old · documented by

Let A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb N have natural density zero. Does there exist a set B⊆NB\subseteq\mathbb N such that

A⊆B+BA\subseteq B+B

and

∣B∩{1,…,N}∣=o(N1/2)\left|B\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\right|=o(N^{1/2})

as N→∞N\to\infty?

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A published argument shows that the conjecture is false, although the two-dimensional-looking special case involving squares remains positive.

The problem asks whether every density-zero set A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb N can be covered by sums from a set BB with ∣B∩[1,N]∣=o(N1/2)|B\cap[1,N]|=o(N^{1/2}). It is cited as an Erdős--Graham problem from 1980.

Known results

  • Erdős and Newman, 1977: the assertion holds when AA is the set of squares.
  • Erdős and Newman, 1977: for almost all suitable finite sets A⊆[N]A\subseteq[N], every additive cover BB satisfies ∣B∣≥min⁡(n/log⁡N,N1/2/2)|B|\ge\min(n/\log N,N^{1/2}/2).
  • Alon, Bukh, and Sudakov resolved the related finite problem with a matching-order upper bound.

2026 counterexample

A 2026 arXiv case study applies the Erdős--Newman lower bound to rapidly separated dyadic blocks, producing a density-zero union AA for which no BB has A⊆B+BA\subseteq B+B and ∣B∩[1,N]∣=o(N1/2)|B\cap[1,N]|=o(N^{1/2}). This establishes a negative answer. The associated AI publicity was corrected: GPT-5.2 Pro reproduced an existing literature argument rather than discovering a new theorem.

Current status (as of January 2026): The general assertion is settled negatively; the squares remain a positive special case.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.