Erdős Problem #846 — Let be an infinite set for which there exists some such that in any subset of of size there are always at least with no three on a line.
Let be an infinite set for which there exists some such that in any subset of of size there are always at least with no three on a line. Is it true that is the union of a finite number of sets where no three are on a line?
References
Primary source
Additional references
UnsolvedMath, Erdős Problems set, ULAM AI, licensed CC BY 4.0.
Progress summary
A concrete infinite set has disproved the proposed finite-decomposition principle, so the problem is now solved negatively.
Erdős, Nešetřil, and Rödl asked whether an infinite in which every sufficiently large finite subset contains linearly many points with no three collinear must be a finite union of such sets.
February–May 2026 counterexample
The explicit construction maps each edge of to . Collinearity of three points is equivalent to a triangle among the corresponding edges. Every finite edge set has a bipartite subgraph with at least edges, giving , while infinite Ramsey theory forbids any finite partition into triangle-free color classes. Independent accounts attribute the construction to a DeepMind prover agent and an internal OpenAI model; arXiv papers provide the mathematical argument.
Current status (as of June 2026): The conjecture is disproved by an explicit construction with ; nothing remains open in the stated problem.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.