Erdős Problem #728 — Factorial divisibility near the diagonal

About 51 years old · traced to

Is it true that for every sufficiently small positive real ε\varepsilon and all real constants C,C′C,C' with 0<C<C′0<C<C', there exist natural numbers a,b,na,b,n such that n>0n>0, a>εna>\varepsilon n, b>εnb>\varepsilon n,

a! b!∣n! (a+b−n)!,a!\,b!\mid n!\,(a+b-n)!,

and

n+Clog⁡n<a+b<n+C′log⁡n?n+C\log n<a+b<n+C'\log n?
References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A formally checked proof now settles the intended nontrivial version, while the original wording also has trivial large-variable examples.

The question is attributed to Erdős, Graham, Ruzsa, and Straus, arising from their work on binomial prime factorizations. The intended formulation excludes trivial cases by requiring a,b≤(1−ε)na,b\leq(1-\varepsilon)n; under that interpretation, the question is now settled.

Known results

  • Erdős (1968): if a!b!∣n!a!b!\mid n!, then a+b≤n+O(log⁡n)a+b\leq n+O(\log n).

January 2026 formalized proof

An arXiv writeup proves that for every 0<C1<C20<C_1<C_2 and 0<ε<1/20<\varepsilon<1/2, infinitely many triples satisfy εn≤a,b≤(1−ε)n\varepsilon n\leq a,b\leq(1-\varepsilon)n, a!b!∣n!(a+b−n)!a!b!\mid n!(a+b-n)!, and C1log⁡n<a+b−n<C2log⁡nC_1\log n<a+b-n<C_2\log n. This implies the requested inequality for every fixed C>0C>0. GPT-5.2 Pro supplied the argument and Aristotle by Harmonic formalized it in Lean; the proof reduces the claim to binomial divisibility and Kummer carry counts.

Current status (as of August 2026): The intended nontrivial formulation is resolved; the unrestricted wording has trivial solutions, and stronger quantitative bounds beyond the logarithmic window remain unoptimized.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.