Integral local invariant cycles in degree one

Let f:X→Δf:X\to\Delta be a semistable one-parameter family of complex projective varieties over a holomorphic disk, with XX smooth and central fiber X0=f−1(0)X_0=f^{-1}(0) a reduced simple normal crossing divisor. For t∈Δ∗t\in\Delta^*, let Xt=f−1(t)X_t=f^{-1}(t) be a smooth fiber, and let TT be the monodromy operator on H1(Xt,Z)H^1(X_t,\mathbb{Z}). Then the natural restriction map

H1(X,Z)⟶H1(Xt,Z)TH^1(X,\mathbb{Z})\longrightarrow H^1(X_t,\mathbb{Z})^T

is surjective.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A repository claims a proof, but no independent mathematical publication verifies it, so the question remains unsettled.

The problem asks whether, for a semistable one-parameter family, every monodromy-invariant integral class in H1(Xt,Z)H^1(X_t,\mathbb{Z}) extends from H1(X,Z)H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}); equivalently, whether the natural map to H1(Xt,Z)TH^1(X_t,\mathbb{Z})^T is surjective.

May 2026 claimed proof; related degree-22 failure

A proofQED entry claims surjectivity, using the Wang sequence and residue calculations, but it is not independently verified. A separate semistable-family construction shows failure of the analogous integral statement in degree 22; it does not settle degree 11.

Current status (as of May 2026): Surjectivity in degree 11 is claimed in a repository proof but remains unverified; no counterexample or corroborated proof was found.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.